July 23, 2016 by Seth

So now if you see a cluster of unrelated people, and more than the normal number of them are  focused on their cell phones,  chances are they are looking for Pokemon. 

I recognized this  cluster of unusual cell phone activity around the  end of the bridge over the Cedar, and verified with the man center background, that there were pokemon about. ← a tag firsts for me. 
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-23 22:45:39 thought 21162
8 comment threads
Seth 2016-07-24 10:09:12 [item 21162#54625]
this thought was reported in the news.   What “it” do you ask about working?
Mark de LA of group mark 2016-07-24 10:11:35 [item 21162#54626]
Mark de LA 2016-07-24 09:38:30 [item 21162#54619]
does it work from the news
The “it” was just me testing to see where my attempt to edit from the news landed.  Apparently I did something which left an actual residue on your item .  You can delete the pile. smug In some cases it does something which lands in N’s Elephant shitting sand box.
Seth 2016-07-24 12:25:01 [item 21162#54631]
yeah personally i had a similar experience.  i downloaded the app and actually caught a Pokemon in the mall with the free ball.   i probably will never play the game again … not really my thing.

the amazement here surprise is how fast this game has spread.  this thought records some evidence of that.   i was comming from Renton River days and noticed a group of unrelated people all with their cell phones out.  I said to denise, i bet they are looking for Pokemons … then i asked the man shown in the picture if he was looking for Pokemons, and he acknowledged that he was.  When i notice something new happening in humanity, it interests me … whether i intend to get involved in it or not.   This is also an example of something that is happening in my experience, outside myself,  which i did not create there myself, and for which i am not responsible.  I even snapped a picture of it laugh.

You might not believe me if i described how long i thought about how to represent this here.  I’m not sure that i have even done it.   Thanks in any case for your interaction.
Seth 2016-07-24 10:43:04 [item 21162#54634]
i dont’t think so, especially since he doesn’t have a smart phone.  but it is on my buck list to talk to him about the game … i too want to know how it has effected his consciousness.
Seth 2016-07-24 10:50:06 [item 21162#54635]
i guess you mean click on the news and then edit or respond where you end up.   in any case you need to be totally aware of which gadget you click on … otherwise you will be writing in a context which is not what you expect.  nathan already said that he will reposition the edit box so that it actually appears where the writing should end up.   wait for it … wait for it ...
Seth 2016-07-24 11:25:08 [item 21162#54636]
ok jason is quite aware of the game … even aspects of it that are quite beyond my knowledge.  there is even a poke stop right outside where he works.   too bad, or too good, that he can’t play it himself, not having an adequate phone or even a data plan.  however it is clear that he would if he could wink
TiggerAndPoo of group nathan 2016-07-24 15:43:52 [item 21162#54637]
Mark de LA 2016-07-24 10:13:43 [item 21162#54627]
FYI, I chased Pokemon a couple of days before this – thought it an interesting app/game which I can’t play & tabled my interest. The news has been full of it even & including Drudge.
Mark de LA 2016-07-24 10:40:37 [item 21162#54633]
Does Jason play?
Why do you say it's happening instead outside yourself? There's no evidence of that whatsoever. In fact from my point of view it is definitely happening inside you. My only experience of it is you reporting.
Seth 2016-07-24 20:14:39 [item 21162#54640]

Well i predict that if you spend some time walking or driving in the streets of  a sizeable city and look with your eyes and ears at what people are doing with their smart phones,

← or look for signs
← or look for bands of people focused on their smart phones, maybe ask them what they are doint.

then you will discover that this phenomena is outside of your version of me … and is affecting how you are creating your experience.  
Well that effect is coming from outside yourself … it comes inside you through your senses.

July 23, 2016 by Seth
From Bobby Flay:  Filling → Peel, core, and slice apples. Mix apple slices with sugar, flour, and cinnamon. Place apple mixture in pie shell.

Dutch apple pie topping:  butter, sugar, oats, flower. 

I cheated on the crust, used pre made sad

← into the oven 350 for 35 min.

ok this was a dismal failure
try this instead
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-23 06:09:31 thought 21158
no comments
July 23, 2016 by Seth
I decided to start putting all of my casts in this internal game that i am playing here rather than gafattie the rest of our mind space.   In a way i did not expect that my mystical internal game would work quite so well in that it would attract quite so many coincidental fits to my psychie.  Oh well … play can be fun happy.
This one is a real doozie surprise ...

5^3 * 13^2 → “greater humanitie’s habits”

i think i now have 13 identified  … i am thinking it can be called “habit” or “automated happening” →  that which happens sans conscious will. 

of course you know that 5 is human if you have been following along.

strangely enough, i think anyone who reads the dialog on “Re: Business Of Linked Data: Opportunities re., Smart Agents (Bots)”  must grock that same interpretation

← my bozomic interpretation is that “about <private>” is unhacking the spiritual. 

works for me smug … but then i am bozo. 
bozo assigns what can be represented as “political lies” to prime 10567.  and that prime falls between two doozies from the previous 2008 election cycle … 10570, and 10560.

so the interpretation of the intent behind the thought  <private> is “more political lies”

interperting out loud bozo’s response Black Lives Matter

2^2  * 7 * 11 * 61

hmmm ….

2^2 could be “insistence of habit” ← more more of the same.

7 * 11 has both inside and outside components.  both spiritual and those connections that happen between us.  it would be the trangualtion of both contexts. 

what is item 61 … or its nearest fix ?  Well item 186 is the closest which makes any sense … and that is about tag aaron’s inteview.   It works for me, my attempt to blog about triangulateing my inside with my outside as i avoided killing the black kids on their bikes was in fact trying to do what aaron was suggesting in “Internet needs serious, well-written, critical investigations into societal phenomena.”.  

Now of course you should notice a Bozonic bias … what the fuck did you expect … after all this is my mind grin

so in “Chicken Lives Matter Too” mark  has gone beyond human to “<private>laughing laughing

21157 is A new ontology

Ok, ok honestly i did not plan this, that would be cheeting.  But i did anticipate it … as in watcH it coming.  Me thinks it is a great match smug,  a great sync between my subjective mind and this external one here
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-10 11:10:34, changed 2016-07-23 06:05:28 thought 21128
3 comment threads
TiggerAndPoo of group nathan 2016-07-21 11:56:34 [item 21128#54517]
Seth 2016-07-21 12:04:16 [item 21128#54519]
yes  that’s going to take a bit of study.
Seth 2016-07-23 06:43:16 [item 21128#54586]
i think this video animates Tesla’s gestalt about multiplication → Times Tables, Mandelbrot and the Heart of Mathematics
July 23, 2016 by Seth
i’m trying to factor out a set of different terms which more accurately describe what is happening here with us humans than the old ones which have so much baggage and confusion attached.  

so thinking out loud … writing sentences in those terms which are true, at least to me  ...

There are beings. 

Each being has an inside which is accessible only to itself,  and a outside which effects other beings.

We humans are beings.  And deeply interacting groups of us are beings too.

We can call what happens inside a being, which is accessible only to itself, “private”, “subjective”, or “spiritual” … and we call that the beings “experience”.

There are beliefs.  Beliefs are subjective.

When a belief in one being matches a belief in another we can call it an “agreement”.

When an experience in one being harmonizes with an experience in another, we call that a sync or a touch.
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-23 05:48:52 thought 21157
7 comment threads
Mark de LA of group mark 2016-07-23 21:25:38 [item 21157#54589]
Something interesting from PR – whose thing is about ontology & he equates it with zen is his morning podcast here on becoming clear: https://peterralstonblog.wordpress.com/2016/07/23/episode-10-how-to-be-clear/ thumbs up
Instead of the word munge he uses smear or smudge in the 1 minute podcast.
Note I use the word as above which is munge ← defined as a bunch of things jammed together as in the tasty mess defined by the urban dictionarylaughing
TiggerAndPoo of group nathan 2016-07-23 15:39:18 [item 21157#54594]
Cool Seth. Nicely done, except the 2nd part of #2. There is no verification that there is an outside that affects other beings … and there is no way to set up a verification that is independent from one’s experience. The 2nd part of #2 is just a theory proposed by a few various models of thought about the nature of reality … and is probably part of the “Baggage” you mention, a carryover in thinking from several generations of living inside the universe model.

The rest seems like a very useful start on a general labeling system for leading edge thinking.   
TiggerAndPoo of group nathan 2016-07-23 15:47:53 [item 21157#54595]
Interesting yes … but in that tiny podcast PR only gets to say there is a smush, not what it is or how to relate to it? How is that helpful?
Seth 2016-07-24 12:24:27 [item 21157#54608]
well of course i can verify that others effect me … that is in my experience.  by assuming that other beings are symmetrical to me, i can logically conclude that i effect them as well. 

but your right … there is no way to verify that without experiencing it.  so it becomes an article of faith, where a person can choose if  they are in some wierd simulation chamber where it is all just their own being being reflected back into their senses.   so its is a axiom that a philosophy can choose … like choosing whether parallel lines meet at infinity or not. 

Incidentally, have you considered the effect on others of you telling them your choice?   For example, fyi, i don’t like that you think the effect of my being on you is just your own doing.    … you have robbed me of my effect on you.  laugh
Seth 2016-07-23 21:11:44 [item 21157#54609]
i like that he said, “pay attention to what happens, what occurs”.  if you don’t, then your awareness is a blur .. a smudge … a mere waving at whatever drives you fancy.  Good advise me thinks indeed thumbs up.

Mark, I have always interpreted your use of “mung” quite differently than PR’s use of “smush”.   You always seem to use “mung” when i combine things that you think should not be combined … or when i describe what i experience happening in a way that does not match your own thoughts on the matter … or come up with a theory which you think is off the wall … or when i recognize a pattern which you haven’t and make a general statement about particular cases.   Have i been interpreting your use of “mung” wrong? 

Anyway sounds as if i should write some true sentences in my ontology that use the words “attention” and “happening” or “occurs”.   thanks for pointing at PR bringing that up thumbs up
TiggerAndPoo of group nathan 2016-07-24 16:40:14 [item 21157#54638]
 Again, I did not say you do not affect me. Others exist. What I said is that you are not outside me. The version if you I experience is the one I create.  You will never experience the version of you that I experience.   Everything I experience I create.  That does not mean you do not exist and that does not mean the things you do do not become part of the experience I create. It simply means that I experience my creation and you experience your creation. It's not some weird chamber, it's your entire experience as it is,  as you are experiencing now, all of that incredible richness is your entire reality. It's everything you experience. And you create every bit of it.
Seth 2016-07-24 19:32:31 [item 21157#54639]
Well yes obviously, the version of me that you experience is inside you.  That can be verified by neuroscience.  But when i say “me” i do not refer to that version of me inside you … i refer to myself that is quite outside of you.   And the outside of that being is what affects you indirectly through you senses.  That is what my “2nd part of #2” is saying.

But when you say that “i create every bit of my experience” you are discounting that part of my experience that comes though my senses from others outside of myself. 
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-23 05:05:18 thought 21156
no comments
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-18 10:52:31 thought 21149
4 comment threads
Mark de LA of group mark 2016-07-18 10:55:25 [item 21149#54442]
thumbs up
Seth 2016-07-21 11:49:28 [item 21149#54516]
surprise i recieved the unique metal hardware for the press this morning.   The wooden frame i must build myself.  It’s gonna be fun cool
Seth 2016-07-22 08:37:09 [item 21149#54569]
note to developer …. please restore the essential capability of fastblogit to upload pdf and other media types like mp3 etc. 
Seth 2016-07-23 05:18:23 [item 21149#54585]
Scott is helping me build this in his wood working shop on Healthy Horizons Family Farm.  it’s almost finished, just got to build the barrell.  Then we will see if we can make some cidar from this Apple Tree Laden with Fruit
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-17 07:08:51 thought 21147
5 comment threads
Mark de LA of group mark 2016-07-18 07:17:26 [item 21147#54406]
Never seen a creature that can piss a straight line like that.
Looks like a misinterpretation of a shadow.  Did you take the picture while he pissed?
Seth 2016-07-18 07:16:27 [item 21147#54408]
yet this horse did.
Seth 2016-07-18 07:33:36 [item 21147#54411]

i was watching the horse up close to get a picture of his eyes … then the animal went to the back of the stall to do his business.    i snapped his picture during that.  the difference in color and how his stream  casts a shadow  should convince you of the veracity of my photograph.
Mark de LA of group mark 2016-07-18 08:23:00 [item 21147#54419]
Mark de LA 2016-07-18 07:40:46 [item 21147#54414]
The shadow & the color of the original stream almost the same is just weird. But you were the one who found it important enough to snap it. Enjoy. Nice looking horse.
Seth 2016-07-18 08:06:27 [item 21147#54418]
Well how close , me and the little girl got to the long horn bull’s horns was quite a bit more close up and personal, surprising and dramatic,  than what the horse did.  Lot’s of people were there to snap that … even her daddy.

i must admit it made me feel queezy, though i wanted to be closer to get a better picture.   i think she was queezy too, even though her daddy egged her on to get his picture.   you should be able to see that in my picture of her.

Seth 2016-07-18 08:35:06 [item 21147#54420]
thanks, mark, for interacting here bringing our consciousness of what happened at the fair closer and more personal to anyone who interprets my representations in this thought.  i never saw a long horn bull up close and personal before … after all, i am but a city boy. 
July 16, 2016 by Seth

i just heard a interview of the director

… sounds like it would be interesting to watch
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-16 12:55:53 thought 21146
1 comment thread
Mark de LA of group mark 2016-07-16 13:15:00 [item 21146#54371]
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3314218/?ref_=nv_sr_1 ??
Frankly I preferred Dating Naked on VH1
July 15, 2016 by Seth

A discussion of the game of Bozomic Decomposition is invited to  happen on this thought.

← this is kind of how it might feel
2^4 * 1321

2^4 could well represent the back-and-forth of  “dialogue”

1321 is right in the middle of when we were discussing how to contrive the wysiwyg entry media of fastblogit .   This thought is discussing how to contrive another new media … a match made in heaven smug
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-14 08:24:47, changed 2016-07-15 15:05:25 thought 21136
no comments
July 15, 2016 by Seth
Water is a media.   When we are in water we are buffeted by the structure of the media in which we swim.  We can say that which happens in a media supervenes on the structure of that media.   For example gliders and blinkers happen in the cellular automata of Conway’s life game.  Yet they look and behave nothing  like the individual cells running the simple rules of the game. 

So just like the molecules of water, or the cells of a game,  prime numbers can become a media.  They can be contrived to network together to play a game.   I wish to uncover some of the propterties of prime numbers which structure the game of Bozomic Decomposition.

The structure rules (structure) of the game itself are :
  • prime numbers get associated to elemental spirits and/or processes and/or happenings
  • thoughts gets associated to numbers – these are called “throws” as in the throw of dice
  • throws get factored into their prime numbers
  • a person interprets the prime factors of the throw to mean something about the thought
  • how well the interpretation hangs true to the thought is noted
  • the person gets rewarded by how closely her interpretation of the primes match her interpretation of the thought itself. 
The structure of prime numbers which affect the texture of the game are as follows (only briefly sketched):
  • every number can be decomposed (factored) into unique components (primes)
  • newthe lower the prime, the more frequently it will occurs as a factor of numbers
by Seth in group seth — 2016-07-15 06:55:54 thought 21140
no comments