Robot Response & Zombie following

In some cases LOA creates robots & zombies who have to reframe others in order to maintain their vortex of excitement & the illusions about LOA ontology. Listening to others or allowing others to have different excitement seems to go out the window at such times.  The qualia which signals a robot response that “this is not the way LOA works” , while not really a part of the RWG, functions in an LOA world as such.  Hopefully there is a cure by developing a strengthened consciousness.
smug
Part II of this is the recognition that “I create my Universe” is that such is like most other Ego defenses & selfie defenses perhaps the ultimate shield.  For if I create my own universe I am therefore a god or God & as such nobody can contradict me, I am always right, I can shift things around at will if I experience internal paradoxes  & contradictions.  It is a super answer as well to the RWG. 
cool

Comments


Mark de LA says
Actually I would end the blurb with the word conversations. smug

Mark de LA says
google Bashar UFO for fun coollaughing

Mark de LA says
TiggerAndPoo 2016-07-28 08:13:26 [item 21098#54815]
You can go the God route if you like. But the other route starting from “I create my own experience” is to relax into the feeling that you are here to enjoy and have fun with others and all the richness that comes from being confident and loving who you are in your creation. As always, you get to choose.
Most people when confronted with the question “How did all of the Universe happen ?” assign the cause to “God the creator” ; nothing at all existing being the expected singularity without variation. Experience is yet something else besides I create it all. Tony uses managing the inner mind as a way to make experience more enjoyable.  Apply any artifact you like to manage that world. Even he says “I Am not your Guru”..

Si says
Yep. Tony and I say “I am not your guru”. If I were your guru I would not say things like “get your head out of your ass” which have the immediate effect of turning you away from all else that I have said … I do that specifically so that I will never become your guru.

What I do is live on the leading edge, exploring the new evolving constructs of the multiverse as they are coming into awareness and applying them in my life. I tell others about these things, not so that I will be their guru, but so that those with similar interests can have real examples of things that are like to what they want.

And I live it fully, as if it were everything, for to me, it truly is everything, my entire experience. I don’t make nice of it and water it down for your experience, that is your job. I tell it like I experience it, in real time, as it is.  

Mark de LA says
Yep, I am quite happy with my own & don’t need yours as an example.  If I were to choose another’s as an example or inspiration I would probably choose Tony’s. smug  Your ontology is highly suspect. As I said (maybe above) choose whatever tools you like to manage your experience.

Si says
Okay, choose Tony’s. Just don’t shit on mine. I don’t care if you need mine as an example or not. You will attract yourself to what you need when you need it. I do what I do and that will either be what you bring into your awareness or it will be others, like Tony’s. It’s all good when you let it be good.  

Mark de LA says
Yep more of the same – already always reframing what I say back into your zombie LOA jargon. (see the body of this item for clarity if you want any).  You can’t help yourself. laughing

Si says
I am me. I am having my experience. That is reality.

Your’ over the edge calling my experience “zombie LOA jargon”. I am never negative to you until you start shit like that. Stop it. You can choose your own path. You do not have to shit on mine. Live your golden rule.

Mark de LA says
You really can’t help yourself & you even get angry & swear at me on occasions when I differ from “your party line” & constant attempts to reframe my experience. The constant reframing to your so-called positivity should be a clue of being in some other trance world when encountering others. Nobody is shitting on you & yours except that elephant in your sandbox.

Seth says
well i sense that both of you have for the moment decided to at least use 3.0 together … i call that progress smiley … especially because it allows me to make this observation here and not interrupt your flow.

Si says
Last chance Mark. If this is the texture of the experience you want, then I can match it and take you on a journey down to the depths of the ugliest parts of your being, or you will bail out when it starts to scare you. I have no limits, you do. So go ahead, or live the golden rule instead, your choice. The version of me you get is the one you want to experience. Many are available, choose wisely.  

Si says

Mark de LA says
Still at it.  Go reference the picture in the first comment. smug threats now (will be denied in the next exchange, eh?)

Mark de LA says
Mark de LA 2016-07-28 09:14:06 [item 21098#54836]
Well Seth I started in 3.0 here & for this comment it flipped back to 2.0  – it has a mind of it’s own which seems to have some dependence on under which regime (2.0 or 3.0) the item was created in & then , maybe?, continues on according to that.  I have expressed before that I don’t care as long as you don’t destroy what I have put out there in the last 10 years. cool I will continue to pretend I know where a comment will land by my intuition & let the cow chips fall where they may. smug
Yeh – it is the flipperoonie thingy that baffles. I guess nobody will disclose what those rules are, eh?  One thing that does change is the text in color.  I used to use color for emphasis & pretty page stuff – like as if I cared to publish it later like that.  Then too there is the paging through a tag room that stops when it runs out of steam.

Si says
Understood on the paging. Nothing pages yet in 3.0. It is work in progress … but the paging planned will be so superior to 2.0 that you will dance when you see it!  

Seth says
looking forward to that yes

Si says