Chicken Lives Matter Too

Don’t abuse your chickens! 
angrythumbs down 


Tags

  1. chicken lives matter

Comments


Mark de LA says
One can celebrate one’s ethnicity or even one’s species (new group emerges → heartLove Our Chickens Don’t Eat Them heart) or use it as an excuse for your own misbehavior. 
Remember →  difference can create dissonance or harmony.

Seth says
nope, it what you have been doing all along … it is exactly what the Rush Limbaugh crowd have been doing against anything that Obama or black civil rights groups have done to take back their rightful pride. 

Seth says
you are interpreting my statement way too narrowly.   harmony and synergy can take many forms. 

Seth says
incidentally you could try a bit of harmony/synergy/growth right here by going into 3.0 at least when we are discussing the same thought … or not, you can just as well keep conflicting the same old way.

Mark de LA says
Mark de LA 2016-07-14 07:55:32 [item 21135#54274]
FYI – in music harmony is not stereo.  In politics it is yet another distinction. cool
I keep telling you but you probably can’t hear considering where you head is up. I keeps flipping back to 2.0

Mark de LA says
Dude, I told you how MY use of harmony was being used.  Redefine the meaning of words to suit your own purposes & don’t be surprised if nobody else joins you or reads your piles of words.

Seth says
well the system automatically switches you back to 2.0 when you go to pages that can only be viewed in 2.0.  but that is temporary … when you revisit pages that can be in 3.0 you will automatically switch back to 3.0.  you should only switch back to 2.0 if you totally close your browser or perhaps open a new tab.  i realize that is not optimal, but the advantages in comments kind of will compensate.

Mark de LA says
Seth 2016-07-14 07:20:22 [item 21135#54272]
… true.   especially the part about difference can create harmony thumbs upsmug … i call it the “stereo effect” in some contexts … and growth or differentiation in others.

incidentally one can also use somebody else’s celebration as an excuse to rag on them. 
Mark de LA 2016-07-14 07:27:20 [item 21135#54273]
Only YOU could do that! thumbs down
They have to shoot cops to do that, eh? fuck you. Talk to Rush about Rush – I speak for myself.thumbs down
How many so-called black leaders are still making excuses for cop killings? Jessie Jackson? Sharpton?, Obama?, etc.
 

Seth says
those who kill cops should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.  black lives matter in no way justifies that.  and in fact many from that movement have said that loud and clearly. 

you may well speak for yourself … but you always speak in sync with Rush Limbaugh in these matters.

Seth says
well it takes two to harmonize or to create common understandings and agreements and cooperation and synergy.   holding me in the wrong, and yourself in the right, just because you insist on interpreting what i say only inside your own ontology is in fact dissonance and the opposite of harmony. 

Seth says
and yes of course … musical harmony is quite different than stereo.   can you gestalt a context in which they share a commonality? ← in other words when does it obtain that the more stereo, the more harmony, the less stereo the less harmony?

Mark de LA says
You may well speak for yourself … but you always speak in total sync with Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, & Obama in these matters. I think your anal sphincter is tightening around your ears so tight that you can’t hear what I am saying even though I am writing it. Maybe your inner voice is all you can hear now. 

Seth says
well yes of course all of that can be true thumbs up.  

but that is the opposite of us syncing up and looking at this social situation that is happening in the world with the stereo of our two different minds. 

Mark de LA says
Sounds like bullshit pile of words.  Be more specific & realistic. 

Seth says
i have not heard any black leaders excusing killing cops … at least not publicly. 

on the other hand i personally see the recent cop killings happening as a consequence of cops killing blacks unnecessarily and not suffering the consequence.   attack sombody and they will attack back ← that is not something that we can wish away.  It is, however, the opposite of a Christian response to being attacked and, in my opinion, the wrong thing to do.   ← That of course is just me talking … i seriously doubt that you will hear that message from a legitimate black leader.  Note i am not justifying cop killing … i am rather seeing it as a natural reaction that like the RWG itself is hard to avoid.

Mark de LA says
Yep, your hearing is tainted.  What is ignored a lot on the left is that the black-on-black killings in the hood are far more prevalent.  Police kill more whites. Havard Professor Roland G Fryer

QUOTATIONS

"On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account," said Harvard economics professor Roland G. Fryer Jr. in the abstract of No racial bias in police shootings, study by Harvard professor shows →

 

THe Wikipedia page on Fryer.

Seth says
the statistics i would like to see is the proportion of blacks/whites shot by black cops VS that same proportion shot by white cops, broken down by region and hairing into the detail of each police department.

Mark de LA says
Go chase it.  What did you get out of the investigation already that justifies refining.?   
“The paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research, which examined thousands of incidents at 10 large police departments in California, Florida and Texas, concluded that police were no more likely to shoot non-whites than whites after factoring in extenuating circumstances.” 
Maybe the importation of illegal immigrants & refugees from other parts of the world will change the statistics & complexions soon enough. Maybe the statistics should be sorted by eye color or dick length or cunt diameter, eh?
laughing
 

Seth says
anyway for me this is not a racial thing,  rather it is a matter of cops shooting people unnecessarily and then not being held accountable.  the laws and judicial processes have evolved to give police officers way too much latitude in defending themselves.   Officers need to be sent to jail, when they cannot prove, beyond a reasonable doubt,  that they actually would have suffered grave bodily harm if they had not shot.  Human life matters much more than justifying the knee-jerk fear of a cop.  

Mark de LA says
Yep if you want kangaroo courts to do your political will regardless of the laws – go for it.  Otherwise what you require is already there & being exercised.  Due process is due process. Seems that Hillary & Bill are the ones who are too big to go to jail.  Where do you have evidence that police are getting away with murder?  Apparently the mob in the streets doesn’t like it, but since when must the mob prevail?