Interesting Pages on G+
About: using strands of fungi as a network, trees and plants communicate with one another and help each other to survive. | big think
Hidden under your feet is an information superhighway that allows plants to communicate and help each other out.
"Plants are not individuals in the sense that Darwin thought they were individuals; competing for survival of the fittest. In fact, they are interacting with each other, helping each other to survive."
Yes. We used one aspect of this, the interconnected filligree roots of the California Redwood trees, in the forest outside Santa Cruiz, to massively extend our wireless network giving wifi coverage to 170 acres of redwood forest from a simple Walmart router … September → October of 2014. The owner of this land and now friend was the inventor of the Prius, I have pictures of me in the prototype, as well as the designer of the unique power supply aboard the voyager space probe.
Engineers will tell you that is ludicrous, but the trees say otherwise. The trees do not believe the engineers.
The information in this article may be new to science, but it is not new to mankind. It is the very basis upon which the art of the Druid was based for thousands upon thousands of years. The trees, and other forest biology, speak, have conversations, and community … we only need listen in the right way.
p.s. I do not say this offhand. I studied to become and am a Druid. 2000-2001 in the forests of southern Ohio. That is mainly what I did with my time for 2 years after Seth and I sold Tame™ until I went to work for Time Warner. I don’t only #PlayNaked in the forest.
Learn something new about my depth every day don’t ya!
There are other interesting things in the G+ groups Consciousness & Citizen connects to play with as well.
For example a blurb on complexity theory:
In essence, Complexity Theory is about how complex adaptive systems work. They look like they’re in equilibrium, and this can be true of anything from a termite nest to a large rainforest, but they’re not really. They’re adaptive systems that teeter on the edge of chaos.
I’ve found that applying that terminology to the study of complex human organizations is very illuminating because empires, civilizations, big states, cities, which after all are the component parts of civilizations, are truly complex adaptive systems.
Okay. Interesting. I could #LOA it easily, but not sure that would be the value added thing to do here. After all, chaos can often be a good thing … it tends to clean house and reset the slate and the state after humans have had a real humdinger of a reality party.
Here is a wonderful opportunity to coin a couple more #hashturds
#KneeJerk & #MachineryThinking . Years ago we noticed that here or somewhere else that the low-priced meat computer neural nets ( perhaps they are #NeuralKnots ) responded automatically in fixed ways in conversations & interaction with others. #NeuralKnots give people their personality & ways of interaction. Peter Ralston of Cheng Hsin would call it building their self or protecting their self. I just label it the #machinery . One might just think of it as an overlay to a map of reality. Another test goes:
Artist Philippe Petit describes a key aspect of creativity: the marriage of madness and structure, for compressing chaos into order.
"I kind of welcome chaos at first as the power of my creativity, and then with a little help from me, the chaos becomes order."
A side-effect of the machinery template was described in the same G+ pot :
The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice. And because we fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is little we can do to change; until we notice how failing to notice shapes our thoughts and deeds.
~ R. D. Laing, Scottish psychiatrist
(Artwork by: Natalie Karwacka)
Other interesting “thought domains” show up linking around in this G+ pool … followed one to
a way out of merely just discussing the egos & edges of each others’ personality ? maybe ?
i look at the effect of nerual nets, which certainly form part of our structure, as the persistence of pattern … of habit … as such it lends us momentum … and yes similar to the repetatveness of a machine. but the other dominant part is our flash out of patterns … the surprise … the recognition of the new … the creation of it … now that is where i live. the two “forces” are beautifully balanced to survive and to flourish. i love it
#Ahriman vs #Lucifer ?
If there are only low priced meat computers with neural nets where does the above come from? Can’t recognize what is not already cognized before , eh?
but the other dominant part is our flash out of patterns … the surprise … the recognition of the new …
… but we obviously do recognize what is new … and we even create it.
so the assumption “can’t recognize what’s not already cognized before” is false.
Using your logic then there is something besides neural nets & the low priced meat computer machinery going on , eh?
first one cognizes & then he re cognizes – basic meaning of the words, eh? ontology bears out such exists in the PR’s sequence of encounter previously blogged about.
8:2 Our thoughts and feelings seem to determine almost everything we do and “are,” but where do our thoughts and feelings come from? We assume it is our “real self” that generates them, but even if this is so, we don’t personally experience this source, nor what’s involved in creating what we recognize as an idea or emotion. Although the complexities of this process will unfold in later chapters, we need to consider the possibility that an unseen dynamic takes place every time we think or feel something.
Ralston, Peter. The Book of Not Knowing: Exploring the True Nature of Self, Mind, and Consciousness (p. 143). North Atlantic Books. Kindle Edition.
i don’t think it really matters how you shuffel or factor your ontology … there are probably as many ways to factor it as there are people on the Earth. whatever works for what i am doing is what i go with. that might be quite different than yours or Peter Ralston’s or nathan’s … but so what? … in my ontology i go with what happens that we can share.
About as vague & fragrant as a fart in a wind tunnel – & tags well as #MakeShitUp i.e. your own #NeuralKnots
yeah but the #MakeShitWork side of that !!
Anyway we got back to discussing each other’s personalities again. I finding G+ more interesting these days. BTW, whatever happened to the FB, G+, & other sites ?
Whatever story you want to tell yourself – perhaps & maybe you think that – some think that making shit up is a long phrase which can be shortened to just a lie. Most of the time lying to oneself is harmless as long as it is about onself to oneself; Darwin may intervene in serious illusions.
p.s. in the 60’s & 70’s some acid-trippers found out they really couldn’t fly off of tall buildings.
i find G+ fertal ground too.
What do you mean, “whatever happened to the FB, G+, & other sites?” … they are still there, last time i looked.
… and some found they could. It all depends on which beliefs you take along with you on the trip. When you understand that reality is an experience happening on top of your beliefs … then it is simply about adjusting the beliefs to suit what you want to do.
OK – I found them on in the green tagroom pages
I’m still waiting for your volcano test to get filmed.
Well, I did film all of us running naked through the woods on a moonless night.
i like the statement …
there is a word for that relationship already very fertile … it’s called #Supervene … not my coin (except here).
reality is an experience happening on top of your beliefs
… was the photo under exposed of over exposed ?
Can’t tell, you’ll have to #MakeShitUp to see it!
When I was a kid I sewed up a whole shirt with just a needle & thread & cloth & pattern . In that case I experiended:
#OMG are those green … okay, if you say so …. … i like the blue ones better anyway
did you notice now that you can almost #HangOut in tag rooms now ?
some are green – traditional tags on items & some are blue for #hashturds
well there should not be a difference there. me thinks #SeriTD is imagining a distinction that does not make any difference to us.
Conversation forked to thought 22118
That is not the distinction. It is as Seth originally defined it.
i.e. Global are blue, group scoped are green. This was the way it was back in FBI 1.0 and now it is that way again. 2.0 was munged a bit on the colors. 3.0 is pure again.
oh, and single thought scoped is chocolate brown. That’s
Even though my iPhone app that shows what Seth sees shows the chocolate brown and grass green as almost the same color … but for me, they are radically different. As different as the taste of chocolate from the taste of grass.
Yep, I just noted the color of the “room” where I re-found the social media portals. Thanks for the clarification.
that wasnt the distinction i was talking about.
i was talking about what mark said …
I still claim that there should be no distinction in the rooms created by tagging a thought and those collected by tagging with #hashturds (as mark so colorfully calls them).
traditional tags on items & some are blue for #hashturds
I have no idea what you mean by that. There are no blue hashtags. Live references have light blue backgrounds. Hashtags have gold backgrounds. Name tags have white backgrounds. Mentography tags are blue text, but that is because they are links and all links are blue. No tags have blue backgrounds.
#argumentative for the sake of ? When I vance on gplus I get a page whose predominant color is a light blue. Lets see. (q.v.) The important thingy was that was where I found the social media portals not colors nor the other distinctions. #ArgueAmongstYourselves
Yes. That’s what I said that you said, but not what Seth thought that you said.
i.e. On that live reference, you go to a global scoped tag room. You can also tell it is global scoped by the page info bar … and by that the toggle says “mark” showing that you can toggle to the “mark” group scope from there … which will have a green background.
… and i was not talking about the background color of the tag … i am talking about which items are collected in which rooms. there is a confusion there currently … things do not always show up in the rooms where i expect (or intend) that they should. i rather think there is a … hate to say it … er, a bug.
I do not write bugs.
I also have not seen any unexpected variance in tag rooms. Please provide example. Thanks!
mark, there is no #argument here … just some disagreement on fact … and/or even a disagreement on intention … and/or maybe some chaotic confusions thrown into the mix. i see no #Egoo transactions involved, least we make them here ourselves.
First i would like to arrive at a common conception of whether there are two different collections. I say, as i said before, that there should not be any difference in the tag rooms created by of conversation taggings and thought taggings. Then i can find the examples … or it was just my own confusion … or maybe just a passing gremlin.
There are differences. Conversations are not mentography. We have discussed this at length before. We have also concluded that we are not yet taking advantage of the intrinsic differences and that when we do so, new navigational dimensions will open up.
You are still welcome to provide examples when you find them.
yes i rather expected that was the #BugABoo between us.
When i tag a though cd catalog or talk about #CDCatalog in some comment or thought body, then i am talking about the very same thing … and when i go to those things i expect both of them to be there.
You, however seem to be reaching for a distinction that is of no use to me, even if you ever do find it.
I already found it a long time ago. And yes, I tag things differently according to the clearly different distinctions. When I put a mentograph tag on something, I am not talking to somebody about it, I am organizing things and drawing arrows between relationships of things. When I put #this in text, I am having a deeper conversation about #this. It is nice that they can show up together (and fortunately still clearly show which is which) in tag rooms. But they are not the same thing at all. Even you have been using them differently, or so I have seen, even if your thinking about what you are doing has not caught up with that yet.
#sethhmmm … but even so there must be a #bug … take a look at the blue and the green rooms for #chalmers that i just used … it is quite informative to me what it collects in the blue room … yet not in the green room … and i doubt that there is any use to your kind of usage either.
start from #reality and you might see the confusion … not from http://www.fastblogit.com/thought/22115
I don’t understand. The blue room is global scoped, the green room is group scoped. What other thing are you referring to? Both show metography tags and conversations that exist in the scope.
#hmmm … I wonder if you are confusing thought scoped clouds with group scoped clouds? They are radically different … even though the backgrounds are almost the same color for you. But they also show a different name. Thought scoped clouds say “conversations on this thought” while group scoped tag rooms say “group <name> conversations”.
Thought scoping looks at all the tags “in that thought” while group scoping looks at all things in the group “with that tag” … quite a different thing … but the only thing that is useful as thoughts are not tag rooms.
yeah … like i orginally said and maintain my #sethhmmm … now is great to see that you have also added yours
Well they can’t be the same thing. One is about ALL on the thought, the other is about THAT ONE in the group. There is no way they could be the same thing. It would not make sense to randomly pick one on a thought and display it for all in the group, nor would it make sense to show all on all thoughts in a group when in a tag room.
← maybe, maybe not … but i don’t think that is even what you have manifested here.
for my part this needs of a certain kind of focus … which i am not going to bring to bear at the moment.
Okay, whatever. I watch the clouds all the time and have seen no inconsistencies with this very simple scheme I have explained … and short of not putting a cloud on a thought at all, there doesn’t seem to be any other thing that makes sense for a thought than showing all the tags inside it.
well like i was trying to imply, it is hard to find inconsistecies which are relative to two different models. when i notice one more pointed i’ll call it to your attention.
- Thought A Law of Attraction Event Story with 809 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought #ThreeLawsOfReality with 548 viewings related by tag "reality".
- Thought #Integrity #authenticity with 443 viewings related by tag "loa".
- Thought Seeking Information with 328 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought Well here i am back in this reality with 306 viewings related by tag "omg".
- Thought The Future Supervens on the Past with 234 viewings related by tag "supervene".
- Thought about: Syrian War - comment 75615 with 230 viewings related by tag "loa".
- Thought 2017A - Spring CD catalog production with 228 viewings related by tag "CDCatalog".
- Thought Are you inside me ... am I inside you ... with 205 viewings related by tag "sethhmmm".
- Thought RFD: The base domain from which we proliferate with 200 viewings related by tag "SeriTD".
- Thought Lucifer Takes over with 200 viewings related by tag "Lucifer".
- Thought Producing the Practical print catalog (fall 2016) with 197 viewings related by tag "HangOut".
- Thought Calling Wolf with 197 viewings related by tag "MakeShitUp".
- Thought #Patterns with 187 viewings related by tag "patterns".
- Thought Enforcement enacted. with 186 viewings related by tag "MakeShitUp".
- Thought Vidar with 181 viewings related by tag "sethhmmm".
- Thought An Creative Map of the Nature upon which we Supervene with 177 viewings related by tag "Supervene".
- Thought LOA Trumps Hillary with 172 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought Wht is consciousness? with 170 viewings related by tag "consciousness".
- Thought #WillToBelieve with 168 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought Sensing ... with 167 viewings related by tag "loa".
- Thought Work on baby ... with 167 viewings related by tag "SeriTD".
- Thought Doing things for others with 164 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought #Supervene with 160 viewings related by tag "Supervene".
- Thought about: The #RWG - comment 67967 with 159 viewings related by tag "Egoo".
- Thought PM musings with 152 viewings related by tag "patterns".
- Thought Notes on Reality by Aleister Crowley with 149 viewings related by tag "reality".
- Thought Taking Control with 141 viewings related by tag "loa".
- Thought about: Megaphone vs Free Speech vs Political Correctness - comment 73418 with 140 viewings related by tag "OMG".
- Thought abraham master groups with 136 viewings related by tag "sethhmmm".
- Thought DMT - and the reality drug with 130 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought Agreements are vunerable to lies with 126 viewings related by tag "consciousness".
- Thought Example of a misassociation with 122 viewings related by tag "hmmm".
- Thought Expression vs Replacement with 119 viewings related by tag "patterns".
- Thought are your thoughts yours alone or are they really available to all who can tune them in? with 118 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought Radical Navigation of Attention with 116 viewings related by tag "sethhmmm".
- Thought Hypnotic Fiction - Alan Watts with 115 viewings related by tag "sethhmmm".
- Thought What comes first ... thinking or doing ... er, always? with 114 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought Conversation on hash tags? with 111 viewings related by tag "hashturds".
- Thought Little magical circumstances. with 111 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought Sometimes SeriTD gets Starry Eyed with 106 viewings related by tag "SeriTD".
- Thought Fallacies and Pallacies with 105 viewings related by tag "LOA".
- Thought Why my trains of thought break ... with 103 viewings related by tag "SeriTD".
- Thought Curating My Long Term Trains of Thought with 102 viewings related by tag "SeriTD".
- Thought General to specific with 101 viewings related by tag "loa".
- Thought Mark Fo Hammer's new age thinking and brain coupling with 98 viewings related by tag "loa".
- Thought [title (23969)] with 97 viewings related by tag "loa".
- Thought Portable Collapsable Lantern with 95 viewings related by tag "sethhmmm".
- Thought about: How some Losers play the RWG - comment 67990 - comment 68201 with 92 viewings related by tag "OMG".
- Thought Consciousness as "transactional relative relivance" reares it's ugly head for the first time here with 87 viewings related by tag "consciousness".