The more static,
the less #pattern.
The more pattern,
the less static.
Well even thought a pattern is in the eye of the observer,
it can still be seen and shared by others.
I believe there is usually an interaction between a pattern in the eye of an observer,
and a spirit (or thing, same thing) outside of, and independent of, the eye of the observer.
In other words,
there is more than just static.seth
That is quite a destinct belief which i hold as undoubtedly true. … articulated by me for the first time here … containing no wispy hesitation of #IDoNotKnow. A belief that works quite forcefully against the not knowing expressed in your response in “#static (comment 79991)” above.
other competing patterns can seem like #static to a pattern.
Works the same inside one person, or inside a whole nation.
But #static is not just competing patterns … static is no pattern at all … it is unknown … it is #chaos.
What is not #static is sharing patterns.
For example, I oppose #Trump … and have a competing pattern.
pattern is the opposite of #static.
static is the background of pattern ...
which distinction is relative to the observer.
I don’t think that part is new or should even be controversial.
The physics aspect of that comes out in the second law of thermodynamics.
But i am focusing in this context on the psychological aspects of pattern/chaos.
The new thing i am pointing out is the relationship of pattern in the eye of a observer, to that which actually causes things to happen. All we actually are aware of is pattern, we can not get out of that predicament, but that pattern is NOT all there is. For example, Islam holds that which causes thins to happen is the hand of Allah.
And just as you observe, “that” is a pattern. You oppose that pattern if you say shit like “there is nothing but static” … or that “there are only the patterns of which you personally are aware”.
Don’t give me your static
1) to cause friction during intense situations
2) an unnecessary contribution of verbal, physical, and/or emotional aggression
Film Reference - Tarantino, "Reservoir Dogs":
"...Managers know better than to fuck around, so if you get one that’s giving you static, he probably thinks he’s a real cowboy, so you gotta break that son-of-a-bitch in two..."
Musical Reference - Everlast, "What It’s Like":
"...And then she heads for the clinic and she gets some static walkin’ through the doors,
They call her a killer, and they call her a sinner, and they call her a whore..."
Drill down to specific propositions about both. What are some cases where you believe in the one, yet you do not believe in the other? Obviously i am not talking about any particular dogma one believes about God, or #static for that matter.
In other words, this Venn diagram is labeled correctly …
…. of course we could just have well switched the labels on the diagram and said the same exact thing. This is just a distinction, it does not matter which is on one side and which the other. That is a “dont’t care” to the binary logic of the Venn Diagram.
Another way to say this is to say that God is order, transforming chaos. You would recognize the distinction better perhaps, if the inside the Venn Diagram i put the label “order” and outside i put the label “chaos”.
Another way to say this is to say, “God is order or pattern, independent of an observer”.
… which idea flies in the face of these kind of memes.
Maybe for fun compare HillaryClinton’s Vagina to a Beached Festering Dead Whale :
Here’s one and you can imagine the other
in other words, you are adding #static to the dialogued.
God is a concept by which we measure our pain ….
---- Imagine that!