I've always wondered what ...
I’ve always wondered what the M$M would do with:
our family has some over here …
hopefully some ass hole kind of “leadership” some day won’t ever set them on fire.
Watch HuLu’s award winning drama “The HandMaid’s Tale” it deals with that kind of political “leadership” in an extreme story.
This one probably has more leftism. Also (▼) in 2004.
the best i can do with it is interpret it as a warning not to get so excited about #Trump’s propaganda.
But then if i believed Trump’s behavior was good, well shucks, its hard for me to go there. Maybe then i would see humor. But the first Facebook comment was truly funny to me, “In the future, please place a warning if you’re going to post a picture of Donald Trump” … then too the comment, “Your at 12, we need you at 7”, that was funny too … but me i’m at -7 … like i said nausea.
But i am curious … what do you get from it? Could you honestly express your reaction. I already gave you mine … i don’t need mine judged … i need to know yours.
Actually, FYI, here is some facts about my reactions to Trump/Obama/Race topics. Denise frequently rags on Trump for selecting out Obama’s accomplishments and specifically un-doing them … when i hear her reaction i get a strong reaction to her reaction that could be expressed, “No i don’t expect even Trump is quite so childish”. But i have to admit, that at times i am not quite so sure.
You description above was all about me … even thought i specifically asked for your own honest reaction. That would have informed. Telling my your false judgments of my reactions does not inform … not in the least.
There is nothing in the picture that suggests anything about Obama. That appears to be narrative that you have added yourself.
The cartoonist was portraying a politician pandering to people’s reactions to big black dicks.
Look how much it excited them!
I am “stuck with the race” aspect because the cartoonist put it there in his story.
Again i am still curious about your reaction to the cartoon. I already know mine: nausea.
Your first sentence is #CBT .
There is a sign in back that says “Thank You, Lord Jesus, President Trump” .
The rest of your comment #CBF & expose more of your stuckness.
Perhaps you did “exposed any of my stuckness” … because ...
Here is how i feel about #Trump in this regard… there is no secret about it. He is a narcissist moron … and the more he panders to people’s juices about race the more his is a evil narcissist moron. I am stuck with that until i see facts to the contrary. He panders to money guns and religion in the same way as he panders to race. Come to think about it, the cartoon is portraying the truth. That truth makes me nauseous about Trumb being our president.
Maybe that is something to which you yourself are blind, eh?
Can you imagine that others do not get off quite so much on that juice?
Nor does their feelings always to to those vibrations. I know mine do not.
But please keep your judgements about my reactions to what you say to yourself. They hit me as lies over here.
Oh, give me a home where the Buffalo roam
Where the Deer and the Antelope play;
Where seldom is heard a discouraging word,
And the sky is not cloudy all day
But shucks mark, what good are your judgements of my reactions told to me. You must know that they will feel false over here? … they are not at all honest interpretations of what *I* feel, say, or do. In fact those judgments of me are all just about you … they are yours … you are 100% their creator … yet you state them to me as if they were true about me.
Me, i tend to do the same, but my idententity of self is not so very narrow and fixed and grand as his seems to me. Mine changes all the time. There was a time when i strongly identified with #p2 … i was it’s being … or rather it’s being was me. I’m calling that crazy now … and i even called it crazy then … facts being what they were. There was a time when i strongly identified with #CyberMind be ing. Well it exists now in a manner of speaking but we did not create it. Currently i am tending to identify with that which we humans create together … relative to that i perceive nathan’s actions here as negative.
To me, it is all about how these circles (networks) of interactions are drawn and defined and maintained and change. I do not draw my identity circle only around my personal inside story. What i actually do and say and feel in the world with others in a network of interaction is far more important to me than the story of my inside personal life (career). I am sure others do that quite differently and that is their right … just as my philosophy is also my right to choose and act out. If you, or nathan want to tell my story, then please make sure that i agree with it … otherwise it seems to me that you are just stabbing me in the heart.
if you grock what i have just said the way i do, then you will also recognize that it follows directly from the #LOA philsophy of “seeing the positive relative to myself and of ignoring everything else”. Eh?
… and, by the way, my philosophy also incorporates people sharing feelings, or #empathy, something that nathan’s philosophy apparently does not because in his philosophy everybody is 100% in total control of their own feelings.
It interesting to note how starlings fly together. It is their personality. It is perhaps one of the most wonderful aspects of these birds personalities. Each species has its own personality, just like each person has their own personality. Well there is a personality to humanity and how we share thoughts and feelings and actions is a wonderful aspect of our humanity. Let us not loose it in a mistake.
How is not needing to form a consensus (or even an agreement) with others connected to a person’s ability to express them self?
also note that aligns with Alan Watt’s Zen story, “you are the entire universe doing what it is doing at your spot in time and other dimensions”, .. or words to that effect … tag #AlanWatts
my ontology, my stroy, actually hangs together well … try as you will, i doubt that you will find a contradiction as long as you stay within my terms. comparing them to your own just means that we are not sharing that part of the story.
and yes i realize about the “higher self”s. there be a very large tale … not one to argue about waving at scripture …. but rather one to find common shareable anchors thereto … else it is all just someone’s story an imagination ... usually told for the angrandisement of one’s simple self.
|Lecture One:||INDIVIDUALITY AND THE GROUP-SOUL||December 04, 1909|
|Lecture Two:||THE GOD WITHIN AND THE GOD OF OUTER REVELATION||December 07, 1909|
|Lecture Three:||THE LORD OF THE SOUL||December 12, 1910|
|Lecture Four:||THE UNIVERSAL HUMAN: THE UNIFICATION OFHUMANITY THROUGH THE CHRIST IMPULSE||January 09, 1916|
Interesting stuff on race from the 4th lecture. GW did say while we were children that at some point perhaps in 3000 years there will be one race but individuals will show up externally with very different kinds of features, perhaps with your noses nearer your assholes.
You will probably understand that if human beings had really become outwardly as alike as the original divine-spiritual forces had intended if Lucifer and Ahriman had not interfered, the feeling that one must love one’s neighbor as oneself would necessarily have developed. There would not have been any choice; for anything else would have seemed to be nonsense, both in terms of feeling and of perception.
However, this development was not supposed to come from the outside because then it would have made us into beings who love automatically — that is, we would have loved others because they are our own kind, but without knowing the force that urges us to this love. Thus, what would otherwise have come to us in unfreedom was prepared for freedom through Lucifer and Ahriman’s opposition. This sanction of the opposition is therefore inherent in the original plan of divine wisdom. Indeed, we may say that in still earlier periods of earthly evolution, the opposition against the harmonious progressive divine-spiritual powers was created precisely so that it could later bring about freedom.
The story goes as follows: Long ago, a samurai was walking at night down the road to Kyōto, when he heard someone calling out for him to wait. "Who’s there?!" he asked nervously, only to turn around and find a man stripping off his clothes and pointing his bare buttocks at the flabbergasted traveler. A huge glittering eye then opened up where the strange man’s anus should have been.