The NEW SLAVERY

About: Wikipedia on Slavery

DEBT is the new slavery. The Greeks were conquered by the Romans and became slaves of the Romans. Perhaps they were less inclined to fight than to think & had a great influence on the Romans even as slaves. You can read all about the history of slavery in the World in Wikipedia. What I am discovering is that what used to be Debt bondage is what we are rebuilding today with a national debt growing exponentially each month.

source: ... Debt bondage (or bonded labor) is an involuntary arrangement whereby a person is forced to pay off a loan with direct labor in place of currency, over an agreed or obscure period of time. When the debtor is then tricked or trapped into working for very little or no pay, or when the value of their work is significantly greater than the original sum of money borrowed, some consider the arrangement to be a form of unfree labour or debt slavery. It is similar to peonage, indenture or the truck system

... In 2009 we work until April 13 to pay off our taxes. What you might look at in the reference is that tax freedom day around the world shows socialist countries like Sweden & Norway have tax freedom day in July or ~56% of the year pays for government.

You would think that Obama, the president, who is sensitive to slavery of the past might be sensitive to what he & Congress are creating in the way of slavery for generations of Americans, but they are not! Is Obama intentionally creating a kind of reverse slavery where those who are rich now have to work for those who are on the lower end of the economy? Maybe so! & so & so & ... appointments of "czars" who have more allegiance to the Alinsky's Rules for Radicals than the U.S. Constitution or some of the founding documents. One of the latest appointments is Mark Lloyd, potentially the media diversity czar will help him silence his critics like Rush & Glenn under the euphemism of diversity. You may not like the sources or my conclusions, but with special advisers who do not pass confirmation in the Senate, many with less than main stream values, many not examined by the M$M, you may rightly wonder if we are not actually being sold into slavery for Obama's dreams of a socialist Utopia.

Comments

Mark de LA says

Here's a bumper-sticker with the right sentiment:

(*)

Mark de LA says

SO....Fuck ALL Y'ALL! for the terrible mess & the slavery to debt that you assholes are creating!

Mark de LA says

Some are waking up! 57% would replace entire Congress!

Mark de LA says

Mark de Los Angeles 2016-05-07 06:59:07 [item 12480#51853]

Is there a search corporate slavery syntax?

While corporate hating is the cause de jure of the leftists, Sandersites & Hillaryites of today, it is nothing new. The Bolsheviks at the beginning of the last century went for a one party system

The Bolsheviks, founded by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov, were by 1905 a major organization consisting primarily of workers under a democratic internal hierarchy governed by the principle of democratic centralism, who considered themselves the leaders of the revolutionary working class of Russia.

Going in that direction would loose the lessons of history in a very ugly way.
search threefoldness for better clues – vocation directed by individuals in a synergy which is dynamic & balanced by the people who produce the goods & services independent of government, etc.

Mark de LA says
Shades of the diversity kings. A diversity advocate of the liberal wing just can’t avoid spouting the mantra of DIVERSITY every other sentence while ignoring the obvious RACIST slur a member of congress attacked congress with. The population – XOR – the media in general can’t help themselves. Anyone examine the meaning of the word?

diversity (n.)
mid-14c., "quality of being diverse," mostly in a neutral sense, from Old French diversité (12c.) "difference, diversity, unique feature, oddness:" also "wickedness, perversity," from Latin diversitatem (nominative diversitas) "contrariety, contradiction, disagreement;" also, as a secondary sense, "difference, diversity," from diversus "turned different ways" (in Late Latin "various"), past participle of divertere (see divert).

Negative meaning, "being contrary to what is agreeable or right; perversity, evil" existed in English from late 15c. but was obsolete from 17c. Diversity as a virtue in a nation is an idea from the rise of modern democracies in the 1790s, where it kept one faction from arrogating all power (but this was not quite the modern sense, as ethnicity, gender, sexual identity, etc. were not the qualities in mind):

The dissimilarity in the ingredients which will compose the national government, and still more in the manner in which they will be brought into action in its various branches, must form a powerful obstacle to a concert of views in any partial scheme of elections. There is sufficient diversity in the state of property, in the genius, manners, and habits of the people of the different parts of the Union, to occasion a material diversity of disposition in their representatives towards the different ranks and conditions in society. ["The Federalist," No. 60, Feb. 26, 1788 (Hamilton)]

Specific focus (in a positive sense) on race, gender, etc. is from 1992.

If you focus on difference you will ignore the fundamental aspects of what is to be HUMAN. Divide & Conquer is the modus operandi of the Liberal Democratic Party. Look at Tucker try in vain to get it across:

Mark de LA says
Conversation forked to thought 23985

The NEW SLAVERY

About: Wikipedia on Slavery

Tags

Comments

See Also