Side by Side

About: $12,984--increase in debt per household since first 2011 bipartisan spending deal | cnsnews.com

Be scared - very scared - PULL UP! PULL UP!

(*)

Comments

Mark de LA says

seth 2012-09-21 15:24:31 16019

M 2012-09-21 13:02:49 16019

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/21/Romneys-More-Generous-Than-Obamas-2011-Tax-Returns-Show-Romneys-Donated-More-To-Charity-Than-Obamas-Paid-In-Taxes

Source: ...

In 2011, the Romneys donated $4,020,772 to charity, which was 30% of their income. The Romneys also paid $1,935,708 in taxes on $13,696,951 in income, which is an effective 2011 tax rate of 14.1%. In total, they gave 44.1% of their income to others.

In 2011, the Obamas paid $162,000 in income tax in 2011. They donated $172,000 to charity. Their effective tax rate was 20.5% and they gave roughly 22% of their income to charity, which means the Obamas gave about 42.% of their income to others.

...

Yeah ... but Obama didn't have to pay 5% of his taxable income plus late fees just to make his statements retroactively true

I presume he had them audited to make sure that the mooks on your side didn't find bullshit to blow up into talking points to side-track the voters on Obama's long list of failures. Bravo if he found more ways to look good or save money from going to government assholes as long as they were within the law.

Mark de LA says

seth 2012-09-22 14:05:56 16019

M 2012-09-21 17:23:32 16019

seth 2012-09-21 15:24:31 16019

M 2012-09-21 13:02:49 16019

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/21/Romneys-More-Generous-Than-Obamas-2011-Tax-Returns-Show-Romneys-Donated-More-To-Charity-Than-Obamas-Paid-In-Taxes

Source: ...

...

Yeah ... but Obama didn't have to pay 5% of his taxable income plus late fees just to make his statements retroactively true

Actually he contrived that more money would go to the government assholes just so that he would look good. I'm not so very sure that worked for anybody except a preexisting Romney lover. It certainly did make him look better to me ... anybody who will pay over $200,000 to the government just to make one of his campaign statements retroactively true, is not somebody that i would trust to make good fiscal decisions.

Yep that's the spin from the commie lefties - the DIY mooks of the Chicago Way. Can't win with them no matter what they do. Complain he pays to little & then he shows what he did & you still complain. No evidence of your shit-assed assertions though. I still wanna know who paid for Obama's going to Harvard etc. How did his grades from UChicago get good enought to go to Harvard? etc. Not going to hold my breath though.

Side by Side

About: $12,984--increase in debt per household since first 2011 bipartisan spending deal | cnsnews.com

Tags

Comments

See Also