thought

When I encounter something like 1549 and I can't recreate it I will tag it with a $finish.  You can do likewise - possibly putting a $finishx if there is already a $finish on it.  The idea being with both tags on the item then we can delete it whoever wrote it to begin with!

Tags

  1. qa
  2. process

Comments


Mark de LA says
Alternatively we could use the tag $wizzard to indicate that the item needs the attention of the Wizzard




Seth says
Well we could try it and see if it catches on.

See Also

  1. Thought RTE Matrix with 6 viewings related by tag "qa".
  2. Thought mind versus machine discussion with 2 viewings related by tag "process".
  3. Thought we need to simlify this bug tracking with 1 viewings related by tag "qa".
  4. Thought Proposed procedure with 0 viewings related by tag "qa".
  5. Thought Triage with 0 viewings related by tag "qa".
  6. Thought need to agree on bug tags with 0 viewings related by tag "qa".
  7. Thought about: Wiki: Introduction To Fit with 0 viewings related by tag "qa".