A mentograph of a Sticky Cyber Molecule

here is an example of a “sticky cyber molecule” …. another blast from the past …. in my persuit to say, “items can be much more that mere blog posts and articles”.

Incidentally, all of that data could be easily coded in just one Json expression.

Comments

Mark de LA says

The first one to figure this out gets a free advertizement on FastBlogIt !

Seth says
of course anyone can get a free add even if they dont, see group ads

Mark de LA says

seth 2005-10-22 10:06:55 1641

of course anyone can get a free add even if they dont, see group ads

That's why this is funny

Seth says

very funny indeed

Seth says

Poe of group da 2016-02-29 09:55:56 [item 1641#47226]

Sticky cyber molecules need GUID’s and GUID based url’s. Just saying. Not that they can’t be made without them, but they will flourish much better with them. Human readable url’s just get in their way and give them extra obstacles to overcome in their existing. Humans do not travel cyberspace by url any more than they travel physical space by Babylon candle. Humans only enter cyberspace via a human url, then they are in and it is gone. Every molecule does not need it’s own door. Only a few are needed in well placed contexts.

absolutely

. i think any unique thing flowing from domain to domain should have a GUID … and that does not even need to be qualified by a domain name as in my diagram. The molecul is actually just a targeted search argument … that cannot usually be answered by existing data anywhtere … so it goes out into cyberspace and tries to attract the answer (or possibility) back to its instigator. It’s very LOA if you think about it.

Holmes says

seth of group seth 2016-02-29 10:13:56 [item 1641#47230]

incidentally we already have quads going here at fastblogit … but have not release them for use apart from the operating system. Those quads all have an explicit context. But when we start writing quads in thoughts, and the context is not explicitidly stated, then me thinks the group becomes the context. Also if just the arrows are specified, then the subject would become the thought itself.

Load up the tip jar and we can get some developers working on that for you. Or maybe find ways to attract them here just for what thinking domains do for them now.

Poe of group da 2016-02-29 10:17:54 [item 1641#47233]

MR of group mark 2016-02-29 10:20:13 [item 1641#47234]

.. just reading the tea-leaves … atomization , early dA remarks .. who knows ..

Poe of group da 2016-02-29 10:25:13 [item 1641#47236]

Getting hungry over there sir?

MR of group mark 2016-02-29 10:26:30 [item 1641#47237]

Nope! just finished some nice fresh pineapple !

Mark de LA says

seth of group seth 2016-02-29 09:39:39 [item 1641#47219]

There are no sticky cyber molecules here at fastblogit or even anywhere in thinking domains yet. We won’t be able to consider using these until we can get inter domain motility of thoughts.

MR of group mark 2016-02-29 09:43:40 [item 1641#47221]

Yeah, I moved this from somewhere because I thought the mentograph & idea might want preserving & did not know if it was a duplicate somewhere else.

seth of group seth 2016-02-29 09:49:42 [item 1641#47223]

… yes i am glad you did.

Sicky cyber molecules are the ultimate search … a thing we blue skyed about way back in th warehouse days. It links things together … a system where things get attracted together more specifically than what is happening now on the web … the ultimat in a targeted search. Hopefully some day it will happen.

MR of group mark 2016-02-29 10:02:10 [item 1641#47227]

one thingy this points out is that once an item is moved the context like what group it was in is lost – get a munge of moving singlets (see atomizing) & whole packets around & I suspect context will take a back seat .

seth of group seth 2016-02-29 10:08:05 [item 1641#47229]

what group did it come from?

incidentally the tags also help establish a context. and in fact everything that it links to, and to which it links, is the context in which it exists. That is the way context happens in a large network, where sombody hasn’t directly established a fixed context for a thought.

MR of group mark 2016-02-29 10:14:11 [item 1641#47231]

yeah … I know there is a stream here that wants to abolish groups but ….

seth of group seth 2016-02-29 10:16:00 [item 1641#47232]

wow … havent heard of any stream here wanting to abolish groups. maybe just rename them “rooms” but they would be the same as thy are now.

Poe of group da 2016-02-29 10:23:32 [item 1641#47235]

Nope. I have not heard of that either. But I recognize this as Mark combing the threads of what he experiences for things he can call out and generate negative energy around. Basically, baiting hooks for a rwg feeding environment. Hasn’t been a good one of those in a few days. You’ll start seeing more bait set out … “mark” my words.

MR of group mark 2016-02-29 10:31:04 [item 1641#47239]

pure shit, dA … none of that is true – mostly incompetent mind-reading lies! I could chase the clues that led to the tea leaves that led to my comment which was just guessing, but you would just munge them away anyway . Stick to your own mind you might be closer to it (or not)

Poe of group da 2016-02-29 10:55:38 [item 1641#47242]

Apparently close enough to the truth to get you hoppin about it. No one ever gets hot under the collar about things that don’t apply.

If someone walked up to you on the street and said “I hate your blue socks, they are ugly” and you were not wearing blue socks, you would just kind of wonder what was going in with them, but hardly be upset about it. On the other hand, if you were wearing blue socks, you would probably be a least a little offended, even if you were polite enough to not show it or you laughed it off.

This is a universal truth. People simple don’t get hopped up about things they don’t think apply to them. Just saying.

MR of group mark 2016-02-29 10:57:20 [item 1641#47243]

Yep, that was what I detected in your comment – apparently there is something about groups that triggered you when something may have gotten exposed.

Poe of group da 2016-02-29 11:00:24 [item 1641#47245]

I just know a hungry ego when I see one. I know what being baited by a hungry ego feels like. More so than ever after spending a lot of time here.

MR of group mark 2016-02-29 11:01:17 [item 1641#47246]

Yep your RWG is stronger than your LOA!

Poe of group da 2016-02-29 11:11:50 [item 1641#47251]

LOA defines how rwg proceeds, and well so. LOA is not biased. It does not judge rwg as right or wrong. It only describes the principles upon which rwg will operate. Like how you are continuing to elicit and receive food right now once you got a taste of it.

What you are talking about is your religious beliefs about how an adoption of a system of principals should make a person more likeable, more amiable to others. Fortunately, LOA is not about that, or you might starve your ego!

Not religious – nothing about religion here that is written by me. The only thingy I am trying to attract is the end of the posts (see below) on this subject. Maybe you are just attracting an RWG , eh? (thinking as all true devotees of the game) that you can still WIN it

& somehow convince me of your horseshit.
Picardfacepalm - you must have the last word okay, it's yours

A mentograph of a Sticky Cyber Molecule

Tags

Comments

See Also