mathematical symbols list (+,-,x,º,=,<,>,...)

BØZØ Ø

Being interpreted in words as the international symbol for the length of a conversation with Bozo.
It is the sum from -null to +null over infinite range of the function ØØ which is usually boolean but maybe not since not all argumentation is binary.
Further symbols to investigate:
? not my cup of tea
? this is not in me
? B ing
& my favorite


(up your ????)

Tags

  1. symbols

Comments


Mark de LA says

Mark de LA says
seth 2014-02-13 08:02:44 17010
I guess that you mean what i say is meaningless to you.
Nope!
Argumentation -> ∞
Which enhances Bozo's otherness to whatever(?).


Mark de LA says
seth 2014-02-13 10:14:03 17010
M1g0r 2014-02-13 09:42:00 17010
seth 2014-02-13 09:19:31 17010
M1g0r 2014-02-13 08:08:19 17010
seth 2014-02-13 08:04:48 17010
you misspelled "be ing".
Can't misspell a non word any more than you can make one up!

making up words that did not previously exist ("non words") is how we make language work.  you can misspell a new word by quoting a different sequence of characters than did the original user.  Practicing A == A is actually fun and good for the mind too ... notwithstanding that it may not help you survive.
How do you misspell a non word? It is just a token.  If I use a different token it is just another token.  Since you have not circulated your token in enough contexts for anyone outside your own mind to make shit out of it, mine is just as good as yours. Probably real communication would use real words; your mileage as always can vary.


well there is some truth to what you say, were we talking here about some random sequence of characters ... but we are not. 

"be" is a natural English word which i am using in the exact sense of the verb "to be".  "ing" is a English stem which is used to turn a verb into a noun.  Now "being" is a noun ... and i am trying to communicate to you the same concept that is connoted to you by that noun, yet at the same time highlight that aspect of it that is actually actively a verb.  I am talking about the same sense of the verb to be that was made immortal by Shakespeare's famous line, "to be or not to be, that is the question".  Fact is, if you decide not to be, then you will not longer be be ing ... and even perhaps not even a being.  Works for me ... please try it honestly ... see if it truly does not work for you.  Could you let me know?  If it doesn't work for you, i won't bother using it again. 
I normally think of being as a verb. I pumped it through this online part of speech tagger & got the following:


Mark de LA says
seth 2014-02-13 09:19:31 17010
M1g0r 2014-02-13 08:08:19 17010
seth 2014-02-13 08:04:48 17010
you misspelled "be ing".
Can't misspell a non word any more than you can make one up!

making up words that did not previously exist ("non words") is how we make language work.  you can misspell a new word by quoting a different sequence of characters than did the original user.  Practicing A == A is actually fun and good for the mind too ... notwithstanding that it may not help you survive.
How do you misspell a non word? It is just a token.  If I use a different token it is just another token.  Since you have not circulated your token in enough contexts for anyone outside your own mind to make shit out of it, mine is just as good as yours. Probably real communication would use real words; your mileage as always can vary.


Mark de LA says
seth 2014-02-13 09:25:55 17010
M1g0r 2014-02-13 08:07:22 17010
seth 2014-02-13 08:02:44 17010
I guess that you mean what i say is meaningless to you.
Nope!
Argumentation -> ∞
Which enhances Bozo's otherness to whatever(?).

oh .  So it means that you think i will argue infinitely?  Why would that enhance my otherness? .... er, i have no otherness to myself ... so i am guessing you mean my otherness to you.  Ok, then i am guessing now that you are saying that you feel further away from me every time you think i am just arguing ... very understandable i must admit.  
Illustrating the equation/meme/definition .... Nice!

Mark de LA says
Some language assistance maybe?


Seth says
M1g0r 2014-02-13 09:42:00 17010
seth 2014-02-13 09:19:31 17010
M1g0r 2014-02-13 08:08:19 17010
seth 2014-02-13 08:04:48 17010
you misspelled "be ing".
Can't misspell a non word any more than you can make one up!

making up words that did not previously exist ("non words") is how we make language work.  you can misspell a new word by quoting a different sequence of characters than did the original user.  Practicing A == A is actually fun and good for the mind too ... notwithstanding that it may not help you survive.
How do you misspell a non word? It is just a token.  If I use a different token it is just another token.  Since you have not circulated your token in enough contexts for anyone outside your own mind to make shit out of it, mine is just as good as yours. Probably real communication would use real words; your mileage as always can vary.


well there is some truth to what you say, were we talking here about some random sequence of characters ... but we are not. 

"be" is a natural English word which i am using in the exact sense of the verb "to be".  "ing" is a English stem which is used to turn a verb into a noun.  Now "being" is a noun ... and i am trying to communicate to you the same concept that is connoted to you by that noun, yet at the same time highlight that aspect of it that is actually actively a verb.  I am talking about the same sense of the verb to be that was made immortal by Shakespeare's famous line, "to be or not to be, that is the question".  Fact is, if you decide not to be, then you will not longer be be ing ... and even perhaps not even a being.  Works for me ... please try it honestly ... see if it truly does not work for you.  Could you let me know?  If it doesn't work for you, i won't bother using it again. 

Seth says
M1g0r 2014-02-13 14:50:04 17010
M1g0r 2014-02-13 14:44:41 17010
seth 2014-02-13 14:12:24 17010
M1g0r 2014-02-13 10:55:41 17010
I also think of being as a noun such as the phrase human being or angels are beings . I don't need abnormal punctuation in order to understand normal usage. I don't grok your distinction that needs the punctuation that is not already in the language.


yep, i was saying that a human being is a human be ing.  That would be a case of me declaring a A == A kind of proposition.  If you don't get it by now, i suspect you just don't want to. 
BØZØ Ø
If you want to detach a suffix & pretend that you have made some enlightened distinction that I don't already have - enjoy! I conclude you have nothing not already discussed & also conclude my interest.


well you see at this point it doesn't even matter that you are experiencing your subjective critique ... the message has still and all been effectively embodied in letters and delivered just for you and now has been duly acked.   the only way i know how you could provide a real critique to me would be to represent the self same thing in words better yourself.  then and only then could i feel the full heft of your snark. 

incidentally, i don't know if your remember,  but in the 80's i actually coded this English stem in infallible CyEnglish and made it work in an absolutely certain binary world. 
ing: (else exx) exrepeat !
... which makes any action continue until it doesn't .

so, "ing" is just about as real of a word as you will get ... and perhaps the only sad part, is that only you and me know it.  

here try it, dear bro, on one of your famous pithologies ...

at "rubber ducker sucker fucker" say ing !



Mark de LA says
M1g0r 2014-02-13 14:44:41 17010
seth 2014-02-13 14:12:24 17010
M1g0r 2014-02-13 10:55:41 17010
I also think of being as a noun such as the phrase human being or angels are beings . I don't need abnormal punctuation in order to understand normal usage. I don't grok your distinction that needs the punctuation that is not already in the language.


yep, i was saying that a human being is a human be ing.  That would be a case of me declaring a A == A kind of proposition.  If you don't get it by now, i suspect you just don't want to. 
BØZØ Ø
If you want to detach a suffix & pretend that you have made some enlightened distinction that I don't already have - enjoy! I conclude you have nothing not already discussed & also conclude my interest.


Mark de LA says
Anyway they are starting the mathematical thinking class again at Stanford .


Seth says
M1g0r 2014-02-18 09:27:43 17010
Anyway they are starting the mathematical thinking class again at Stanford .

Woopse ... looks like i already missed it .... for did it not start "Monday, February 3, 2014".  the last time i really wanted to do it but could not manage to keep up with the pace.  i had thought it was more of a thingey one could take up at my own pace ... but instead it does kind of happen with others during a specific time. 

... hmmm, maybe we could do it together at our own pace ... that might be fun.

See Also

  1. Thought Representation and Representing with 59 viewings related by tag "symbols".
  2. Thought Can We destroy Symbols by Association with 29 viewings related by tag "symbols".
  3. Thought Bill Clinton honors the confederacy with 3 viewings related by tag "symbols".
  4. Thought The Popesickle Symbol - Hammer & Sickle & Crucifix with 3 viewings related by tag "symbols".
  5. Thought Good vs Evil with 2 viewings related by tag "symbols".
  6. Thought White vs Black Manifesto by Dylann Roof with 1 viewings related by tag "symbols".
  7. Thought about: Alister Crowley speaking in The Equinox with 1 viewings related by tag "symbols".
  8. Thought about: source of this image with 0 viewings related by tag "symbols".
  9. Thought Confusing the map for the territory with 0 viewings related by tag "symbols".
  10. Thought Some Move Onward - Others Are Stuck in the Past with 0 viewings related by tag "symbols".