NO-LABEL not likely to have the truth, whole truth & nothing but the truth emerge in it nor is the writer of same likely to acknowledge the different recollections of the account.
He also must be lying regarding his previous "totally over it" comment somewhere in his postings yesterday otherwise there is no excuse for posting it as he did.


  1. item 17231


Mark de LA says
seth 2014-03-30 08:19:35 17233

i posted it merely as a record of the event.  It records my memory.  My posting was actually directly in response to your statement, "Yeah, so am I except our interpretations of the moment yet differ & what's so is in dispute." in the hope that you would provide your account of that same event.

Your accusation of my dishonesty here comes as a stark surprise to me .
Your posting was a surprise to me despite your convenient excuse to do so in spite of what you said that you are "so over it".
I am not going to continue or waste more time on the RWG  or
kaongaifaywhanghidoo of what I already described my difference elsewhere.

See Also

  1. Thought An event circa 1981 with 4 viewings related by tag "item 17231".