Me
About: seth russell - google+
Tags
- bozo faust
- vidar
- seth
- sum
- bzosnoteating
- who cares
- self
- bozo
- me
- selfie
Comments
Mark de LA says
More about Seth
Seth says
Einai
2014-04-15 12:42:41 17289
Yep, you can't
separate yourself from your opinions, point of view, beliefs or PRETEND
to do so!
You are
involved - don't shun it! or banish it & see what
happens.
You are
involved - don't shun it! or banish it & see what
happens.
Seth says
Well i don't know if that mean spirited remark is about you or about me ... but i do know that it is not about the picture on 17300. So now you can have fun looking at it here.
Well i don't know if that mean spirited remark is about you or about me ... but i do know that it is not about the picture on 17300. So now you can have fun looking at it here.
Seth says
Einai
2014-04-17 09:50:18 17289
seth
2014-04-17 09:48:16 17289
They are different functions. That functional separation is not, as GW says, merely an abstraction.
Are the two different functions of this hammer a mere abstraction?
No certainly not !
Einai
2014-04-17 09:32:15 17289
Because, if you
had read it, it says that thought, feeling & will are integrated
as one thing. A piece that
analysis usually forgets. It is
analysis that makes them
separate.
They are different functions. That functional separation is not, as GW says, merely an abstraction.
Are the two different functions of this hammer a mere abstraction?
No certainly not !
So, as usual, Seth
contradicts GW!
Nothing interesting here - just Seth's mind spinning around. A hammer is not a Soul.
Nothing interesting here - just Seth's mind spinning around. A hammer is not a Soul.
Seth says
seth 2014-05-04 10:56:21 17294
Einai 2014-05-04 10:54:17 17346
seth 2014-05-04 10:52:17 17346
source: mark
NO ERROR AT ALL DUDE! - plunge maybe - the question asked is why the definition [
] has that page in it (since the definition is in a different page) - which you still have no clue for. Since, er ... it appears outside you that you are trying to be funny with the .. er ... splunge . I gave you a better context for it since, for me, it is not even cute. Your mileage may vary, of course!
NO ERROR AT ALL DUDE! - plunge maybe - the question asked is why the definition [
] has that page in it (since the definition is in a different page) - which you still have no clue for. Since, er ... it appears outside you that you are trying to be funny with the .. er ... splunge . I gave you a better context for it since, for me, it is not even cute. Your mileage may vary, of course! ... again with the switching of contexts 
. You error was to switch the context of my usage of "er" with the context of GW's ming word "er" ... you did that switch in your phrase "More on your predilection for the ming word er" ... which ... er, i have never used in my life.
I am allowing this rwg here only because it illustrates one of the salient features of meaning. That is: a mark in one contex means something differnet in a different context. Different beings have different contexts for the same mark. Switching those contexts is how communication gets confused between beings.
. You error was to switch the context of my usage of "er" with the context of GW's ming word "er" ... you did that switch in your phrase "More on your predilection for the ming word er" ... which ... er, i have never used in my life. I am allowing this rwg here only because it illustrates one of the salient features of meaning. That is: a mark in one contex means something differnet in a different context. Different beings have different contexts for the same mark. Switching those contexts is how communication gets confused between beings.
Is Bozo only interested in his own context? Maybe expand your horizon, dude.
Incidentally, dear Sir ... i am very interested in the context in your mind ... that is why i sped so much time listening to it. What is infuriating is exactly where you switch some symbol in your mind bound to the context there in your mind, for the same symbol in my mind knowing that it bound to a different context here, and then claim that it *I* who am confused. Do you see the difference? And do you see how you are continuing to do it in your very comment above?
Mark de LA says
seth 2014-05-04 11:41:57 17294
Well certainly where i do it too, the error is just as very agrevious and should be pointed out ... er specifically. If that switch of context on the same symbol is to be called a "splunge" then so be it ... we will have a word in common that we can use. Notice to be aware of the splunge one must be able to identify the mark or symbol that is being used to mean different things to you and to me.
Einai 2014-05-04 11:21:36 17294
seth 2014-05-04 11:11:44 17294
seth 2014-05-04 10:56:21 17294
Einai 2014-05-04 10:54:17 17346
seth 2014-05-04 10:52:17 17346
source: mark
NO ERROR AT ALL DUDE! - plunge maybe - the question asked is why the definition [] has that page in it (since the definition is in a different page) - which you still have no clue for. Since, er ... it appears outside you that you are trying to be funny with the .. er ... splunge . I gave you a better context for it since, for me, it is not even cute. Your mileage may vary, of course!
NO ERROR AT ALL DUDE! - plunge maybe - the question asked is why the definition [
] has that page in it (since the definition is in a different page) - which you still have no clue for. Since, er ... it appears outside you that you are trying to be funny with the .. er ... splunge . I gave you a better context for it since, for me, it is not even cute. Your mileage may vary, of course! ... again with the switching of contexts . You error was to switch the context of my usage of "er" with the context of GW's ming word "er" ... you did that switch in your phrase "More on your predilection for the ming word er" ... which ... er, i have never used in my life.
I am allowing this rwg here only because it illustrates one of the salient features of meaning. That is: a mark in one contex means something differnet in a different context. Different beings have different contexts for the same mark. Switching those contexts is how communication gets confused between beings.
. You error was to switch the context of my usage of "er" with the context of GW's ming word "er" ... you did that switch in your phrase "More on your predilection for the ming word er" ... which ... er, i have never used in my life. I am allowing this rwg here only because it illustrates one of the salient features of meaning. That is: a mark in one contex means something differnet in a different context. Different beings have different contexts for the same mark. Switching those contexts is how communication gets confused between beings.
Is Bozo only interested in his own context? Maybe expand your horizon, dude.
Incidentally, dear Sir ... i am very interested in the context in your mind ... that is why i sped so much time listening to it. What is infuriating is exactly where you switch some symbol in your mind bound to the context there in your mind, for the same symbol in my mind knowing that it bound to a different context here, and then claim that it *I* who am confused. Do you see the difference? And do you see how you are continuing to do it in your very comment above?
That's exactly what I complain about your comments on my items or comments. 
& coined the word splunge to identify it with.
Bravo!
& coined the word splunge to identify it with. Bravo!
Well certainly where i do it too, the error is just as very agrevious and should be pointed out ... er specifically. If that switch of context on the same symbol is to be called a "splunge" then so be it ... we will have a word in common that we can use. Notice to be aware of the splunge one must be able to identify the mark or symbol that is being used to mean different things to you and to me.
Hmmm... just seems like one of Seth's symbols rotated 90 degrees.
What did Bozo's original symbol mean?
What did Bozo's original symbol mean?
Seth says
Well certainly where i do it too, the error is just as very agrevious and should be pointed out ... er specifically. If that switch of context on the same symbol is to be called a "splunge" then so be it ... we will have a word in common that we can use. Notice to be aware of the splunge one must be able to identify the mark or symbol that is being used to mean different things to you and to me.
Einai 2014-05-04 11:21:36 17294
seth 2014-05-04 11:11:44 17294
seth 2014-05-04 10:56:21 17294
Einai 2014-05-04 10:54:17 17346
seth 2014-05-04 10:52:17 17346
source: mark
NO ERROR AT ALL DUDE! - plunge maybe - the question asked is why the definition [] has that page in it (since the definition is in a different page) - which you still have no clue for. Since, er ... it appears outside you that you are trying to be funny with the .. er ... splunge . I gave you a better context for it since, for me, it is not even cute. Your mileage may vary, of course!
NO ERROR AT ALL DUDE! - plunge maybe - the question asked is why the definition [
] has that page in it (since the definition is in a different page) - which you still have no clue for. Since, er ... it appears outside you that you are trying to be funny with the .. er ... splunge . I gave you a better context for it since, for me, it is not even cute. Your mileage may vary, of course! ... again with the switching of contexts . You error was to switch the context of my usage of "er" with the context of GW's ming word "er" ... you did that switch in your phrase "More on your predilection for the ming word er" ... which ... er, i have never used in my life.
I am allowing this rwg here only because it illustrates one of the salient features of meaning. That is: a mark in one contex means something differnet in a different context. Different beings have different contexts for the same mark. Switching those contexts is how communication gets confused between beings.
. You error was to switch the context of my usage of "er" with the context of GW's ming word "er" ... you did that switch in your phrase "More on your predilection for the ming word er" ... which ... er, i have never used in my life. I am allowing this rwg here only because it illustrates one of the salient features of meaning. That is: a mark in one contex means something differnet in a different context. Different beings have different contexts for the same mark. Switching those contexts is how communication gets confused between beings.
Is Bozo only interested in his own context? Maybe expand your horizon, dude.
Incidentally, dear Sir ... i am very interested in the context in your mind ... that is why i sped so much time listening to it. What is infuriating is exactly where you switch some symbol in your mind bound to the context there in your mind, for the same symbol in my mind knowing that it bound to a different context here, and then claim that it *I* who am confused. Do you see the difference? And do you see how you are continuing to do it in your very comment above?
That's exactly what I complain about your comments on my items or comments. & coined the word splunge to identify it with.
Bravo!
& coined the word splunge to identify it with. Bravo!
Well certainly where i do it too, the error is just as very agrevious and should be pointed out ... er specifically. If that switch of context on the same symbol is to be called a "splunge" then so be it ... we will have a word in common that we can use. Notice to be aware of the splunge one must be able to identify the mark or symbol that is being used to mean different things to you and to me.
See Also
- Thought Vidar with 230 viewings related by tag "Vidar".
- Thought The ego bubble plane with 154 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought [title (21932)] with 141 viewings related by tag "WhoCares".
- Thought Autolagnia with 96 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought Earliest know use of social software (circa 1947) with 63 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought Christ with 50 viewings related by tag "self".
- Thought Pride & Thanks feel Good with 26 viewings related by tag "self".
- Thought Fake News Explosion with 24 viewings related by tag "WhoCares".
- Thought Announcing Ability to Better Express Ourselves with 19 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought A haircut 2017 with 17 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought A New Respect for The Specific with 17 viewings related by tag "me".
- Thought Distinctions that I can make that make more sense to ME with 14 viewings related by tag "self".
- Thought The smiling faces of childhood with 12 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought To BE or NOT 2 B ? Is There a Question in There Somewhere? with 12 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought Alibaba with 12 viewings related by tag "WhoCares".
- Thought Baby pisser with 10 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought The Biography Channel with 8 viewings related by tag "self".
- Thought Seth, Genesthai, and Lotus's Sculpture of Ahriman with 8 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought The Tooth Fairy with 7 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought What is in a name? with 6 viewings related by tag "bozo".
- Thought Seth fights Mark & Mark fights Seth with 6 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought I sync too ! with 6 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought Subject vs Object with 6 viewings related by tag "self".
- Thought OMG, where are my glasses again ? with 6 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought Zucchini Bread with 6 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought Negativity with 5 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought Self vs Not Self with 5 viewings related by tag "self".
- Thought Bozo Faust with 5 viewings related by tag "bozo faust".
- Thought identity crisis with 4 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought Successful interaction is all about timing ... with 4 viewings related by tag "self".
- Thought An event circa 1981 with 4 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought Prometheus with 4 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought Get Well Soon with 4 viewings related by tag "who cares".
- Thought Your intrepid blogger with 3 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought Looking at my blind barber haircut with 3 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought bozometry with 3 viewings related by tag "bozo faust".
- Thought [title (17107)] with 3 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought about: gallery of wackos with 3 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought coincidental arbitrary associations with 3 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought about: provoked by the meme, Know Yourself with 2 viewings related by tag "self".
- Thought My Reality with 2 viewings related by tag "me".
- Thought IS Consciousness aware of itself? with 2 viewings related by tag "self".
- Thought Magic with 2 viewings related by tag "bozo faust".
- Thought Moving Parts create Possibilities. with 2 viewings related by tag "me".
- Thought The last selfie of me, the 3D bucket ... with 2 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought Happy Bird day to the WhiZ with 1 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought Regrowing Suburbia with 1 viewings related by tag "bozo".
- Thought The Voice of Leadership with 1 viewings related by tag "selfie".
- Thought Seth and Grandma with 1 viewings related by tag "seth".
- Thought For Seth - the survivor from Jim Warren with 1 viewings related by tag "seth".