My Truth? Your Truth? Who Knows?

The flip side of the
My Truth/Your Truth/Their Truth coin
is an inability & desire not to stop
ARGUING  & HAGGLING

Wait a minute there will be some more ...

The CURE
,,,

Contemplate
IS
for a while.

.

Comments


Mark de LA says
BTW you translated what I wrote into your cybermind, ignoring what I wrote & said I was wrong.
Nice going .

Last comment on 17375 is pertinent here as well.


Mark de LA says
seth 2014-05-16 10:31:01 17390
whatever.  

i wrote a paragraph, which you put above.  To call it a pile objectively is to disrespect it.  Now if you said, "I do not understand what you said, to me it is just a bunch of words strung together", that may have expressed your attitude towards my word more honestly ... er, and objectively.  But then you would have to admit to some small deficiency ... and that, apparently, would hurt your ego too much ... or at least that is the way this appears over here.
Yeah , whatever^^^3
Bozo has yet to understand the notion of corpus & how it relates to MyTruth<->YourTruth.
but he will whip out the RWG if he can use your comments as a touchstone for some of his.


Mark de LA says
Example of a pile while I was writing this 17390
seth 2014-05-16 10:01:21 17389
source: ...
"pile" is the wrong word to use here ... it has connotations that contradict the nature of a network of words.   Surly you must know that.Incidentally when i designed CyberMind i made a pile, a heap, that was used as temporary storage of tons.  It was a menton, i think it was named "temp".  It was a pile in that things were thrown on its top which had no relationship to each other.  In a network everything is related in some fashion to anything else in the same network.  "Pile", or "heap", are words that describe some collection of things where the relationship between them is not known or not important. I think you need to introduce the concept of agency ... that who collects the objects.  To that agent the thing is not a pile ... it is a collection ... it is a context.   But yes, i suppose to a person who does not grock the context, then that which is in it appears to be just a pile.  Without the concept of agency you really cannot honestly call anything a pile .... for to call something a pile is to judge that it not related ... and that judgement is always subjective to some agent.
...




Mark de LA says
The notion of feisty comes to mind also I google feisty & came up with this image.
All in good fun if the ego is not too bruised.


Mark de LA says
seth 2014-05-16 10:35:35 17390
Einai 2014-05-16 10:30:20 17390
BTW you translated what I wrote into your cybermind, ignoring what I wrote & said I was wrong.
Nice going .

Last comment on 17375 is pertinent here as well.


i really have no idea what most of that actually refers to.  sorry, i simply cannot crawl into the way you have this in your mind enough to even make a reasonable guess.
Tisk, tisk & now you will never know or care.


Mark de LA says
... not a woman either, eh?

Mark de LA says
Here is a wonderful scene from Women in Love which opens up artistic vision.  Elsewhere there is a scene about an anthurium equally vulgar. The latter has a line something like "& now that you have seen it you will always see it.


Mark de LA says
seth 2014-05-16 11:18:38 17390
Einai 2014-05-16 10:59:04 17390
seth 2014-05-16 10:51:56 17390
well you may not know that i actually did study these kind of corpora notwithstanding that you claim that that I have "not yet to understand the notion".  It is possible for people to interpret a truth in one corpora that the same people would not interpret in another one.  I have no idea whether that is what you are getting at here or not.  If it is important to you, i presume that you will just tell me.
Quote the WHOLE CONTEXT & ponder again without deletions.
Bozo has yet to understand the notion of corpus & how it relates to MyTruth<->YourTruth.

i am quite complete in this regard.  Again, i can only presume that if there is something important for you to tell me in relationship to this that you will in fact articulate it.
There is, but in fact were you also to contemplate that there IS & you can access it, with the wanting to know state of being, as per BofNK or some other you might find it. Losing Interest & reflexing "I don't know" with your own brain in favor of having some one else explain & do the work will never yield results imho. In a way I can understand what you do, as in the body of this item, is a kewl mechanism not to know so as not to have your own understanding argued & quibbled over either.


Mark de LA says
so we both have done our best & I am complete with that.adios!

Mark de LA says
seth 2014-05-16 12:07:21 17390
Einai 2014-05-16 11:37:50 17390
seth 2014-05-16 11:18:38 17390
Einai 2014-05-16 10:59:04 17390
seth 2014-05-16 10:51:56 17390
well you may not know that i actually did study these kind of corpora notwithstanding that you claim that that I have "not yet to understand the notion".  It is possible for people to interpret a truth in one corpora that the same people would not interpret in another one.  I have no idea whether that is what you are getting at here or not.  If it is important to you, i presume that you will just tell me.
Quote the WHOLE CONTEXT & ponder again without deletions.
Bozo has yet to understand the notion of corpus & how it relates to MyTruth<->YourTruth.

i am quite complete in this regard.  Again, i can only presume that if there is something important for you to tell me in relationship to this that you will in fact articulate it.
There is, but in fact were you also to contemplate that there IS & you can access it, with the wanting to know state of being, as per BofNK or some other you might find it. Losing Interest & reflexing "I don't know" with your own brain in favor of having some one else explain & do the work will never yield results imho. In a way I can understand what you do, as in the body of this item, is a kewl mechanism not to know so as not to have your own understanding argued & quibbled over either.


Well Mark i have already contemplated, more than i really care to, what you are saying here.  Apart from what i articulated above, all that i can get is just your own invitation to RWG, of which i am ultimately disinterested.  But if you do actually articulate what is here beyond what i said in my own words above, and is not just RWG, then i surly will listen quite intently.
yeah, well ......

Seth says
Einai 2014-05-16 11:46:06 17390
Here is a wonderful scene from Women in Love which opens up artistic vision.  Elsewhere there is a scene about an anthurium equally vulgar. The latter has a line something like "& now that you have seen it you will always see it.


...

... sap that that smells strange on your fingers so that even goats won't taste it  ... and when the fig has kept her secret long enough ... so it explodes ... and you see through the fissure the scarlet ... and the fig is finished ... the year is over ... that's how the fig dies ... showing her crimson through the purple slit ... like a wound, the exposure of her secret on the open day ... like a prostitute, the busted fig makes a *show* of her secret ... that's how women die too. 
... ... yes yes well said indeed.



i guess you already know that i am not secretive like a fig ... i fear no death in their exposure.  But perhaps that is just me