Makes Me Wonder if ... Retarded Lives Manner

About: f*** yo flag movement calls for black lives matter violence on 9/11

What would happen if a white guy did this & pointed back in the direction of the Black Panthers, Farrakkan or somewhere like the #WhiteHouse

(With Apologies to retarded people! Arrogant CUNTS notwithstanding)

source: ... Over the past 35 years in America, an estimated 324,000 blacks have been killed at the hands of fellow blacks, proving “racist” white cops are the least of their worries. - See more at source.:

• Over the past 35 years in America, an estimated 324,000 blacks have been killed at the hands of fellow blacks, proving “racist” white cops are the least of their worries. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=21594#sthash.NHVLLGUG.dpuf
Over the past 35 years in America, an estimated 324,000 blacks have been killed at the hands of fellow blacks, proving “racist” white cops are the least of their worries. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=21594#sthash.NHVLLGUG.dpuf
Over the past 35 years in America, an estimated 324,000 blacks have been killed at the hands of fellow blacks, proving “racist” white cops are the least of their worries. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=21594#sthash.NHVLLGUG.dpuf
Over the past 35 years in America, an estimated 324,000 blacks have been killed at the hands of fellow blacks, proving “racist” white cops are the least of their worries. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=21594#sthash.NHVLLGUG.dpuf
... To focus your racism mind on the dozen cop killings that got into the news & not notice the criminals & black-on-black killings is just distortion & willful inciting civil unrest & murder of some cops.
• Over the past 35 years in America, an estimated 324,000 blacks have been killed at the hands of fellow blacks, proving “racist” white cops are the least of their worries. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=21594#sthash.NHVLLGUG.dpuf

Tags

  1. retards
  2. retards matter
  3. cunts matter
  4. racism matters
  5. arrogance matters
  6. WhiteHouse

Comments

Mark de LA says
BTW inciting riot (Wikipedia)

Mode of trial and sentence

Riot is an indictable-only offence. A person convicted of riot is liable to imprisonment for any term not exceeding ten years, or to a fine, or to both.[10]

See the following cases:

  • R v Luttman [1973] Crim LR 127, CA
  • R v Pilgrim, 5 Cr App R (S) 140, CA
  • R v Keys, 84 Cr App R 204, 8 Cr App R (S) 444, [1987] Crim LR 207, CA
  • R v Cooke, 9 Cr App R (S) 116, CA

Mark de LA says
seth 2015-09-10 13:13:30 18799
Well i find all of this irrelevant to the judgement at hand.  Comparing the number of crimes of blacks to  crimes of police,  and then to use that to divert attention from cops unnecessarily  killing citizens with no dire onsequences, is morally corrupt reasoning.  
That's because you have a narrow mind on the subject. The question of race relations, crimes by minorities & crimes by law enforcement are part of a whole picture.  Am still waiting for Obama to resolve the situation with some sort of statesman like context on the subject but I won't hold my breath.


Mark de LA says
Meanwhile : http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/09/10/farrakhan-calls-on-blacks-to-boycott-christmas-bonanza-for-white-business/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
~~
Some seem to have a whole different idea of what Justice is than I do. An Eye for an Eye or simply revenge went out with the Golden Rule at the Sermon on the Mount (especially 7:12).




Mark de LA says
seth 2015-09-11 10:53:34 18799
(;-)) 2015-09-11 09:19:54 18799
Meanwhile : http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/09/10/farrakhan-calls-on-blacks-to-boycott-christmas-bonanza-for-white-business/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
~~
Some seem to have a whole different idea of what Justice is than I do. An Eye for an Eye or simply revenge went out with the Golden Rule at the Sermon on the Mount (especially 7:12).




Strange the tit-for-tat mentality of equating black-on-white crime, with white-on-black crime, seems to me to be the same eye-for-eye mentality which you seem to suppose is not justice.  I mean are criminals to be held responsible for their deeds independent of unrelated crimes, or not?
Your false premise gives you your shitty conclusion.
Mark de LA says
seth 2015-09-11 11:49:06 18799
(;-)) 2015-09-11 11:30:57 18799
seth 2015-09-11 10:53:34 18799
(;-)) 2015-09-11 09:19:54 18799
Meanwhile : http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/09/10/farrakhan-calls-on-blacks-to-boycott-christmas-bonanza-for-white-business/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
~~
Some seem to have a whole different idea of what Justice is than I do. An Eye for an Eye or simply revenge went out with the Golden Rule at the Sermon on the Mount (especially 7:12).




Strange the tit-for-tat mentality of equating black-on-white crime, with white-on-black crime, seems to me to be the same eye-for-eye mentality which you seem to suppose is not justice.  I mean are criminals to be held responsible for their deeds independent of unrelated crimes, or not?
Your false premise gives you your shitty conclusion.

well outside of the RWG game, i can't figure out what you are pointing out with such a pointed judgement about what i said.

The essence of which is: 
  1. criminals should be held responsible for their crimes independent of unrelated crimes.
  2. doing tit-for-tat is to commit new crime (tit), in response to an unrelated one (tat)
  3. doing 2 breaks the rule in 1.

I applied that logic to the case where someone diverts attention from one crime (police-on-citizen) to another one (black-on-black or black-on-white).   Point being that those crimes are unrelated, and the one does not shed light on the other, when considering justice. 

Do you not agree with (1) ?

CRIMINALS SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR CRIMES!.