Sleeve-job of references

About: sleeve-job

seth 2005-11-06 05:16:26 1902
it is interesting to see how the wishlist~ might be met with this plan:

"RSS" is in feeds project
"edit directly from the news" is in [title news project]
"from one group & identity into another" could be done in [title groups and headers project]
... "mechanism that allows quick change from one group & identity to another one" is not scheduled before the fold

3 out of 4 ...

'nuf said

Comments

Mark de LA says
Often when I encounter an empty room I don't know whether it is because I am not authorized because everything there is secret or because it is just a sleeve-job.

Seth says

Mark 2005-11-06 08:29:14 1905

Often when I encounter an empty room I don't know whether it is because I am not authorized because everything there is secret or because it is just a sleeve-job.

...

so is refering to things in the future is a

Mark de LA says

seth 2005-11-06 08:44:35 1905

Mark 2005-11-06 08:29:14 1905

Often when I encounter an empty room I don't know whether it is because I am not authorized because everything there is secret or because it is just a sleeve-job.

...

so is refering to things in the future is a

- who knows? Traveling a dead end link is just about the same feeling as a sleeve-job. Perhaps it is just a [link~target: item 2000]

Seth says

[link~target: item 200] is almost profound

Mark de LA says

seth 2005-11-06 09:03:48 1905

[link~target: item 200] is almost profound

Were you referring to this sleeve-job

source:

seth 2005-11-06 09:08:43 200

it retained the author, but lost the picture because it was a pre rte item ... see [reference~referand: tag $bug,old item]

on the item referenced ?
Maybe we need Winnie to give us a sleeve-job emotey

Seth says
actually [link~target: item 200] in our current mind is a lie ... it would have been more profound wer it written at 100. No, i was refering to putting an intentional tag in the label of a wiki reference and not telling a lie .. as in [reference~referand: tag $bug,old item] which last time i looked had no referand.

Mark de LA says

seth 2005-11-06 09:20:19 1905

actually [link~target: item 200] in our current mind is a lie ... it would have been more profound wer it written at 100. No, i was refering to putting an intentional tag in the label of a wiki reference and not telling a lie .. as in [reference~referand: tag $bug,old item] which last time i looked had no referand.

To me, the [reference~target: item 2000] was very zen because it was itself what it referenced ~ congruency, my man

. You might hone your distinctions of what the word lie means.

Seth says

woops ...

... i introduced a typeo , you'r right: [reference~target: item 2000] is yet true

. woops again

... vancing currently brings us back to this item. I would affix a $bug

to this item, but since it's tags are already recursive i fear the google barber of seville

Mark de LA says

The only

I can find is that sleeve-job references don't give a user more clues as to why the room is empty. That's more of a wish than a

& speaks to that empty room message as somewhat ergonometrically un-navigable.

Sleeve-job of references

About: sleeve-job

Tags

Comments

See Also