thought

Unified Field theory of the Mind see also 7727 for the original version. I still say this is close using the whole internet.

There is a sequence of thought in human endeavor which we variously identify as a train of thought, logic or rationalizing. There is also a sequence of feeling which can lead us into some target state (willingly or otherwise) - such is the realm of NLP & the movies. What about a sequence in the will domain & the beingdomains? Well being is always within the context of NOW - so a sequence would be hard to find. However, a sequence of will could be thought of as ritual, program, ceremonial magick or possibly a script or even a trance. Sequence & object are analogous to the parts of speech: verb & noun respectively.

Comments

Seth says
incidentally this should not be in group fbi … good though

Seth says

seth@fbi 2015-12-20 14:53:43 [item 19291#38409]

what is the difference between a sequence of will and what happens?

mark@fbi 2015-12-20 14:59:58 [item 19291#38413]

probably not much unless you want to throw out your own consciousness/ego. Happen doesn’t need an actor. Like I summarized & distilled already: “Shit happens”.

nathan@fbi 2015-12-20 15:05:18 [item 19291#38414]

Hum. A Forest Gump quote. Nice!

i don’t know mark … in my experience shit does not happen, unless somebody makes it happen … so am not comprehending how i have “thrown out my own consciousness/ego” at all.

Seth says

mark@fbi 2015-12-20 15:50:11 [item 19291#38418]

it goes to the evolution – it belongs here . once we had a vision.

Si says

nathan@fbi 2015-12-20 23:48:26 [item 19291#38431]

Hummm. Title subversion happening here. Blank real title and fake title added. The interesting thing is that will hide this post from title searches.

I wonder what the implications of that is in Seth’s larger mind?

mark@fbi 2015-12-21 07:26:30 [item 19291#38442]

This was a result of copy & paste of a section of the original item. Why the link is there is new behavior.

nathan@fbi 2015-12-21 07:29:21 [item 19291#38444]

Yes. I thought you just had a way around getting your stuff to appear in title searches and the like!

But why didn’t you fill in a title? Should that be allowed? This is a way to avoid public finding. That could be a feature.

seth@fbi 2015-12-21 07:50:37 [item 19291#38453]

well we must presume that a blank title is intentional on the part of the author. i do it all the time. maybe because i can’t think of a title for a item. and yes it then will not come up in a tille search. i see no proble with that. the same with tags incidentally.

that said, titles of private items used to show in the news … maybe they still do … so the rule here was that if you really want to keep a secret to your group, don’t put it in the title.

Okay. Then it’s a feature. Good to know.

thought

Tags

Comments

See Also