loa glossaries of terms

google law of attraction glossary  & here is one I posted elsewhere before.


Mark de LA says
http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Attraction-Guides/dp/1592577598 – Kindle $10.99
Scan through it at google books https://books.google.com/books/reader?id=l7vx24pd3r8C&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&source=gbs_atb&pg=GBS.PP1.w.6.0.0 

Mark de LA says
seth 2016-01-27 11:36:48 [item 19778#43807]
closest i can find is …

Going with the Flow - feel the powerful calling of Source Energy You calling the rest of you toward it. And when you go - you feel ease, you feel elation, you feel passion, you feel freedom, you feel euphoria, you feel love and appreciation. When you don't go - you feel heels scraping on the pavement, you feel the tension of the vibrational discord. You just gotta go with who-you-are if you are to feel good.

nathan 2016-01-27 11:38:52 [item 19778#43809]
seth 2016-01-27 11:40:01 [item 19778#43810]
yet it feels there is more … and the edges of that is what bozo seeks
nathan 2016-01-27 11:43:38 [item 19778#43811]
I will probably write more someday. But not likely here in this group where Mark can make it private or censor it just because it offends his idea of what communication is about. Memes and youtube pointers and all these things are as solid a form of communication as anything on this subject. It’s a living subject, to be experienced, not a dead subject to be pondered and pontificated upon.
seth 2016-01-27 11:45:18 [item 19778#43813]
Mark 2016-01-27 12:00:19 [item 19778#43820]
Some people only know how to quote, assert & declare & keep it as “The Secret” – lots of troglodyte versus thelemite ism in keeping up those high-flying disks. Lets see how much openness shows up in a domain at playnexus or elsewise on the subject. rose
nathan 2016-01-27 12:03:08 [item 19778#43821]
Don’t care about openness. Only care about experience. Don’t want people writing about it. Want people doing it and others watching and jumping in. That’s what “expereince” is about. And that’s all life is, an experience. There is no other thing. When doing is writing, that is okay. But volumes of text about it is not of value to anyone who would use it … only to those who would not.
My Rottweiler indicates excitement with her tail .   Maybe will post an youtube of it some day. Elsewhere d’A mentioned openess – must have changed something.

Seth says
come on sombody … post a tuit

Mark de LA says
seth 2016-01-27 11:33:46 [item 19778#43806]
the word “excitement” does not appear in any of your glossaries … does it?  i think that is something new … a way of talking beyond just “positive thinking” … and may mean something more than just the definitions we could find in the dictionary.  that is what i am expecting here.
Mark 2016-01-27 11:50:09 [item 19778#43815]
maybe it is something d’A made up ..
optimism has been around in a long NOW – MR
-OR- youcanUtube it : https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=abraham+excitement newlaughing – btw we don’t have an excitement emotey either! <------- urgent surprise
nathan 2016-01-27 11:51:38 [item 19778#43816]
Try this one  
Mark 2016-01-27 11:53:16 [item 19778#43817]
Yeah, but that is already personalized to U,d’A
nathan 2016-01-27 11:54:12 [item 19778#43818]
Pretty much the same thing!   
seth 2016-01-27 12:10:11 [item 19778#43824]
mark’s got a point here … would feel wierd me expressing my personal spring with what is essentially tigger’s advatar.
Clues on excitment from the etymology dictionary  …. I like doodah 
doodah (n.) Look up doodah at Dictionary.com
"excitement," 1915, from refrain of the minstrel song "Camptown Races."
arrah Look up arrah at Dictionary.com
supposedly a characteristic Irish expression of emotion or excitement, 1705.
hubba-hubba (interj.) Look up hubba-hubba at Dictionary.com
U.S. slang cry of excitement or enthusiasm, first recorded 1944.
exciting (adj.) Look up exciting at Dictionary.com
1811, "causing disease," present participle adjective excite (v.). Sense of "causing excitement" is from 1826. Related: Excitingly.
IOW, excitement is individualized as I said elsewhere:

One man’s excitement is another man’s boredom.


The qualia of the “I” as inspiration & intuition comes forth in lots of ways.  Found this in:

The “I” appears in four conditions, which may be described briefly as: the “I” in the physical body, ordinary consciousness; the “I” in the etheric body, imaginative consciousness; the “I” in the astral body, inspirational consciousness; “I” in itself, intuitive consciousness.

Unger, Carl (2012-05-01). The Language of the Consciousness Soul (Kindle Locations 735-738). SteinerBooks. Kindle Edition. 

Found “accidentally” using my kindle waiting for routine blood tests this AM.  Lots more around the quote in the book. 

Mark de LA says
seth 2016-01-27 12:56:14 [item 19778#43826]
i think the aspect that is being talked about might be described as “a spring to action”.  the aspect is about motivation.  watc(h) it when you actually do something.  could be begrudging … could be just because you have to get up to pee … could be forced by the government … could be because you have to bring in the cows or they will run away …. or could be exciting.  ← of course that is just bozo talking out the side of his neck, i am no expert here, notwistanding that i have been  focusing on all of my life.  CFR got into this too … remember some of his exercises.      


Ouspensky personally confessed the difficulties he was experiencing with self-remembering, a technique to which he had been introduced by Gurdjieff himself. Gurdjieff explained to him this was the missing link to everything else. While in Russia, Ouspensky himself experimented with the technique with a certain degree of success and in his lectures in London and America, he emphasized its practice. The technique requires a division of attention, so that a person not only pays attention to what is going on in the exterior world but also in the interior. A.L. Volinsky, an acquaintance of Ouspensky in Russia mentioned to Ouspensky that this was what professorWundt meant by apperception. Ouspensky disagreed and noted how an idea so profound to him would pass unnoticed by people whom he considered intelligent. Gurdjieff explained the Rosicrucian principle that in order to bring about a result or manifestation, three things are necessary. With self-remembering and self-observation two things are present. The third one is explained by Ouspensky in his tract on Conscience: it is the non-expression of negative emotions.
More on the 4th Way 

ccording to this system, the three traditional schools, or ways, "are permanent forms which have survived throughout history mostly unchanged, and are based on religion. Where schools of yogis, monks or fakirs exist, they are barely distinguishable from religious schools. The fourth way differs in that it is not a permanent way. It has no specific forms or institutions and comes and goes controlled by some particular laws of its own."[citation needed]

When this work is finished, that is to say, when the aim set before it has been accomplished, the fourth way disappears, that is, it disappears from the given place, disappears in its given form, continuing perhaps in another place in another form. Schools of the fourth way exist for the needs of the work which is being carried out in connection with the proposed undertaking. They never exist by themselves as schools for the purpose of education and instruction.[2]

Similar to a lot of what PR describes about Transformation in Pursuing Consciousness.  As PR explained direct experience is neither direct nor experience but such is the best words he can find until you get close enough to grok it on your own.  Excitement & Enthusiasm as qualia out of the ordinary meanings are the best d’A can find at this time. Imagination, Inspiration & Intuition were those of RS, etc. & he knew what he was talking about (in German) . 

Mark de LA says
nathan 2016-01-27 11:37:37 [item 19778#43808]
I don’t post about LOA here. Because of this “Mere pointers to outside websites & youtubes may be curated by the owner.” and because of other things said in comments in an apparently now private post. Just the fact that it is now private proves the unworthiness of writing here.
Mark 2016-01-27 11:55:25 [item 19778#43819]
.. that’s a steamer – monkey – not a tiger.
retracted – but assign just pointers elsewhere as  boring.