Thoughts

Since real thoughts – not necessarily fbi? thoughts – the ones that well up in the mind or wherever – are not burned in to anyone & are beings shared by any who attract them – treat them as friends (or enemies) etc.  – they are possessed by nobody but will return just as human friends do. At lest mine do.
 
heart

Comments


Holmes says
Agreed!

Seth says
it is interesting to note the actual relationship between what we call “thoughts” in thinking.domains, and what you call “real thoughts”.   The former represent the latter.  see representation for the context of that statement.

Mark de LA says
Magor of group mark 2016-02-18 10:04:29 [item 20014#45950]
Yep – this post is about the ones that do or do not pop into your head. The other axe is grinding here is not really pertinent. .  Will later probably do another item titled something like “The LOA of attracting Arguments” … but not just yet.  I say just as a recipient of your one-way comment that you are attracting deletion.
seth of group seth 2016-02-18 10:27:43 [item 20014#45959]
well seems to me that my comment here was exactly pertinent to your thought here.  In your thought you compare fbi thoughts with real thoughts … then you say how to treat the real thoughts … well i can certainly can hail your advise there : “thoughts  are possessed by nobody but will return just as human friends do”.   But should we have the same attitude towards the representations of those thoughts?  Does the representations that happened in one context get changed when we enter a different context?  Does information from those old contexts get forgotten?  ← i think not.
WOW – I covered that already – am talking about thoughts in the mind not whatever meta-stuff you run.  WIll cover that in my LOA for arguments post .

Mark de LA says
Johann Wolfgang von of group da 2016-02-18 10:05:05 [item 20014#45951]
Yes, well I am all for your design for you. Sounds like a cool and different story. That is not how I experience thinking and I can’t say I have ever had an experience like that even in all the different kinds of writing I do … except perhaps auto-writing, where you channel another entities actual thoughts, but different from channeling a personality like I am doing this week.
Magor of group mark 2016-02-18 10:10:17 [item 20014#45953]
Yep, we are differentthumbs up – I am in a much different hypnotic trance. … or as Bandler said somewhere The problem is not getting someone into a trance but getting him out of the one he is in. 
Johann Wolfgang von of group da 2016-02-18 10:21:52 [item 20014#45957]
Why is everything a problem? Why can’t beings come here to have any experience they want and not get categorized and defined and sent to therapy?
Magor of group mark 2016-02-18 10:27:01 [item 20014#45958]
Are you suggesting that,\? I’m not!   Bandler is a trance/hypnotist expert – it relates. That is one of his sayings. The context would not fit in this space. pondering  My quest is dispelling trances altogether – & going directly to the consciousness of it all. Yours ??? only you know.
Johann Wolfgang von of group da 2016-02-18 10:36:03 [item 20014#45961]
Mine is having an experience. I assume the same of others.
Magor of group mark 2016-02-18 12:07:08 [item 20014#45973]
whatever that means JWvG 
seth of group seth 2016-02-18 12:09:21 [item 20014#45976]
yes of course!   but then what does “JWvG “ mean either?
Magor of group mark 2016-02-18 12:11:05 [item 20014#45977]
That is his initials + an emotey questionmark
seth of group seth 2016-02-18 12:22:08 [item 20014#45979]
oh … so what was the question? … were you questioning his identity … or asking what he meant?  do you really care about either?  I am just saying that your response was hard for me to interpreted in any context other than just a ego transaction. 
Magor of group mark 2016-02-18 12:29:48 [item 20014#45980]
Catch up. JWvG Agreed. Seth just had to comment & go in a different, already-always direction. Would have left it stand except the no-forking quality of his comment. 
seth of group seth 2016-02-18 12:32:41 [item 20014#45982]
well of course … you guys are doing these ego transactions exclusive of real edges of experience … me, i wanted to play too ?
& throw some RWG bait into the pot just for kicks.  I prefer the original naked post myself.