Simple! - Just Erase the Other part of the Tao

 
 

Tags

  1. unity
  2. agreement
  3. rwg vanishes
  4. embedded cryptic tags

Comments


Mark de LA says
Mark de LA 2016-06-20 07:13:49 [item 21044#53109]
NO opposing duality allowed 
Seth 2016-06-20 08:16:34 [item 21044#53114]
being allowed or not, is not really the question.   there is nothing, no spirit, no being who stand there allowing or not.  like the meme says, “resistance is futile”, … me, i accept that and move on.  God, after all, is Great!  Why quibble?
Mark de LA 2016-06-20 08:21:25 [item 21044#53115]
So nothing prevents the RWG & it hasn’t been repealed thumbs up
Saying “God is Great” is like saying the Universe is Big – woopie shit! (Melanie’s favorite saying)smug
Seth 2016-06-20 08:28:40 [item 21044#53116]
well if you want to rwg, then nobody will prevent it ← if that was what you meant.

Melanie was true thumbs up … except about the “woopie shit” part.  me, and billions of Muslims think that par of it is pretty kewl cool … a welcome antidote from the “I am Great” of Trumpism currently sweeping our nation. 
Read better – all Melanie did was coin the phrase quite often of “woopie shit” – had nothing to do with the rest.  
You identify with Muslims?
What’s Trump doing here?
From the news last night:
BOOK: Hillary Clinton called disabled children 'f***ing ree-tards'...
Jews 'stupid k***s'...
Bill called Jesse Jackson 'damned n****r'...
 

..
so the name calling continues (rwg?) 
smug

Mark de LA says
I suspect Trump never said “I am Great” . I looked for YouTubes & did a google. He says I will Win etc though. Find a recording, dude .laughing

Mark de LA says
Seth 2016-06-20 08:46:25 [item 21044#53119]
omg how stupid of me to choose a different interpretation of your punctuation than you intended  … who must now grieve … me, you, or both of us? laughing

I believe,  “The Universe is Great”,  and that comforts me.  I learned to say that from Islam.   If now, you and Trump are going to profile me for my beliefs and attitudes,  then fuck you in your ass. 

 
Sorry dude, that is forbidden in Islam these days – see the Orlando Gay Massacre. 
I think the phrase “fuck you in the ass” is probably an RWG thingy. laughing
I use your literal words since I can’t hear tonality & interpret body language from your Me(I).

I identify with HUMAN – get over it!


Mark de LA says
Maybe there is hope for Seth:
http://scroll.in/article/810093/orlando-shooting-its-different-now-but-muslims-have-a-long-history-of-accepting-homosexuality – maybe you can go for the camel afterwards:

laughing

Seth says
Seth 2016-06-20 09:00:25 [item 21044#53122]
well there is an undeniable hierarchy:   me,  human, universe.   necessarily i identify in all of those hierarchies … the relative strength of the identifying varying from time to time and context to context.   i hate to be all logical and all to those who are going in the opposite direction, but hey, if 2 is required,  i can 2 with the best of you laughing
Mark de LA 2016-06-20 09:09:50 [item 21044#53123]
There are strings of something there that only munge together because typographically there is a paragraph;
no meaning to grasp onto, however. Your hierarchy may be your invention – some unify ALL.  N seems often to claim it all as his invention.
pondering
Seth 2016-06-20 09:22:22 [item 21044#53127]
well my paragraph means something specific and particular to me … it actually said something … but granted it might be too deep in sum for you to grock over there.   ← which does contradict your “no meaning to grasp onto” ← which is obviously true only to you ← if it is even that.

The obvious heirachy:  “me ← human ← universe”,  my invention ?   laughing  ← halarious

“1” away with your unity, bro … the biggest wave of all … so big in fact that is is almost not even there.  Me, i prefer the finer frequencies.  But then i told you that already … too bad you never hear shit from others … oh well.  Maybe i could even prime that … 5261 anyone?  laughing^2
Mark de LA 2016-06-20 09:27:08 [item 21044#53130]
Your anal sphincter is leaking a lot these days. Ontologically speaking you don’t experience the Universe. If you are the only one who can understand what you write maybe you should make it private instead of graffiti on mine.
laughing
Seth 2016-06-20 09:40:56 [item 21044#53132]
well you are probably right about “not experiencing the Universe” … it being way to big and pervasive and … er, Great !   which of course begs the question of why “some unify ALL ?”.  

why should i assume that nobody can grock what i write ?  

i am, after all, very careful about the sinage that i post.  Of course, people wandering in suburbia on a Saturday morning, not being able to see Mark-A-Log against cardboard, or copping an attitude towards the practice of Garage Sale Signs themselves, will never find the goodies splayed out on my lawn available for trade. 
Mark de LA 2016-06-20 09:52:43 [item 21044#53134]
Again more stuff – mostly (99%) internal to you. Enjoy the self expression. Let go the sphincter some more.
surprise
thanks … my trick in fact is,  to represent externally that which is so internally deep as not to be accessible to you.  stuff which is a bridge too far in that context is quite normal landscape … not surprising … and almost not worth noticing.  but when something jumps up and slaps you in the face … ahhh … now that will be worthy of the surprise that happens … and well worth the tedium of the rest of the landscape. 

Si says
Seth 2016-06-20 09:11:30 [item 21044#53124]
← the facebook cast for this thought

My interpretation:  2 squared:   Contradiction of Contradiction – well that matches perfectly.  

The new prime,  5261, is yet to be named in anyone’s ontology.  But here it is singular.  I wonder what it could be in my art.  pondering
Mark de LA 2016-06-20 09:13:31 [item 21044#53125]
This is misplaced – put it somewhere else unless you want some graffiti on it.
Seth 2016-06-20 09:25:52 [item 21044#53129]
but it already happened
Mark de LA 2016-06-20 09:29:10 [item 21044#53131]
Maybe what we need are embedded cryptic tags here. laughing
Seth 2016-06-20 10:14:32 [item 21044#53138]
indidentally i meant “fastblogit” cast ...not “facebook”.     the casting mechanism is simple … just use the thought number and enter it in the prime number factoring tool here.   the interpertation is up to whomever just according to their own ontology.  i think that is clearly exemplified in Bozomic Decomposition.  it is a game, and an art, played if at all for whatever gestalts happen in you. 
Hummm 

See Also

  1. Thought Zen Gorilla offers his Point-of-View with 24 viewings related by tag "unity".
  2. Thought about: common knowledge and aumann’s agreement theorem with 1 viewings related by tag "agreement".
  3. Thought Getting from I to We with 0 viewings related by tag "agreement".
  4. Thought Zen and the Art of playing the Agreement Game with 0 viewings related by tag "agreement".
  5. Thought Flowerful Unity with 0 viewings related by tag "unity".
  6. Thought Agreement with 0 viewings related by tag "agreement".
  7. Thought Competition vs Cooperation with 0 viewings related by tag "agreement".
  8. Thought trying to retrieve a train of thought with 0 viewings related by tag "agreement".
  9. Thought Mini-Epiphany with 0 viewings related by tag "agreement".
  10. Thought An interesting image ... with 0 viewings related by tag "agreement".