How to create a common reality ...

When we tell each other true things, by writing true sentences to each other, we are actually creating a common reality.

seth

Comments

Si says
I can lean toward this though I am not exactly sure what “true sentences” means. Being authentic with each other clearly builds common reality.

Seth says
well when i write a sentence, if when i read it back, it rings true to me, then i would call that “a true sentence”. if the sentence is addressed to another, then it will ring true to me, only if i am being authentic with that person (or persons). Pretty simple actually.

Si says
Seems like authentic and true sentence are very similar if not the same.

Seth says
seems to me authentic is a relationship between beings … “I am-authentic-to You” etc. true applies to all things (spirits) in my verses … so those could be gestalst or whatever, not necessarily beings. ← just ontology stuff.

so the point here in my thought is: that is how we create these sprits (things, gestalts, manifestations, etc) together …. we write true authentic sentences to each other in their context (in their verse). that way those common realities come into be-ing. perhaps that is not the only way … but it is a way indeed.

… er, but if we write lies and un-authentic and mocking shit to each other … well then nothing is going to stick … nothing will ever be created that way.

Si says
I don’t think trueness or authenticness has anything to do with if something is created or not, common or otherwise. But I do think it has a lot to do with if you are in your vortex or not. In other words, if you are living in harmony and flow with who you are and what you desire to be … with what makes you happy and satisfies you at your deepest levels.

An authentic common reality is much more satisfying.

Seth says
well that vortex harmony and happy satisfaction would be all just about me … internally … inside myself. but we were talking about a common reality. a common reality is necessarily not just inside myself. … er, otherwise we would not call it “common”.

Si says
It would be all just about you, yes. And ... if you are in your vortex, and the other(s) are in their vortex, then the likelihood that you will keep sharing and building your “about you” realities very similar with a lot more in common is much much greater!

Seth says
a common reality is necessarily not just inside myself. ← please note the word necessarily. in other words the sentence cannot be true and deny that part … it is implicit in the very language itself. Like for example, “a bachelor is necessarily an unmarried man”. you can argue whether the person is a man, or whether he is married … but if you agree that he is a man and is married, you must also agree that he is a bachelor.

Si says
You are right, in order for it to be common, the elements that are common must be duplicated in both you and an other. That’s what makes it common.

Seth says
seems that the “duplicates” you refer to are the being’s interpretations of “the elements that are common” and not “the elements that are in common” themselves. see diagram above.

Si says
The diagram above is diagrammed in the universe model. I would have to make one for the multi-verse model.

Seth says

yes of course, i think it will be the hard to do and keep the diagram simple and ringing true. ← which is why i drew mine to provoke you. the duplicates are inside … they must be. that which is common is outside – it must be. lots of luck

Seth says
i was wondering if it should make a difference in a diagram whether the “common thing” was created by man or not … for example, the cup is artificial, one of man’s creations … but what if the “common thing” was not part of that world … what if the “common thing” was natural, like for example a tree, or the moon, or the earth itself ?

How to create a common reality ...

Tags

Comments

See Also