Wasted Efforts

So much elaborate focus to censor thoughts, comments & enhance political correctness, self-styled ontological purity & enforce LOA for some individuals seems to attack FREEDOM.  Every dictator in the political realm wants to silence opposition, disagreement or alternate realities. Some use FORCE of some kind or another; from guns to book burning.  Even FB uses censorship to some extent for what it calls “hate speech” .  Some just waste energy trying to silence others’ points of view.

I demand FREEDOM !

FREEDOM is my human right!

In fact you can’t take it away from me ultimately for very long. null 

Tags

  1. PoliticalCorrectness
  2. EthnicIntimidation

Comments


Si says
And now you have much more freedom! For now you can clean up your own space and your own thoughts and pretty much do-as-thy-wilt anywhere you are the owner … and others still won’t loose access to the content they wrote.

Isn’t it nice that you can now clean your own material without having to make it private?   

Mark de LA says
… depends upon how it operatesnull haven’t used any new features or offered anything oppositional here today except perhaps this item.

Si says
Sounds good. These changes add considerable freedom. Of course, freedom has a price. If it is true freedom it is allowed for others as much as for the one … so just as you have much more freedom to curate your thoughts and zap things you don’t like, so does everyone else. It works both ways … and the nice thing is people can’t loose content they personally wrote.  

Mark de LA says
I would like to clear the news stream – too much “stuff” to sort through still left behind when “mark all read” is done.

Si says
99% of the time “mark all read” clears ALL yellow. And if it doesn’t, it will soon (next time you do it probably). Not sure what the problem is. I only look at yellow stuff at the top. It’s nice to have all the rest there for historical reference when I need to look for something. There is no efficiency issue. SeriTD is very thrifty about what is sent back and forth to the server.

Mark de LA says
Yellow stuff not all at the top.  FB I can clear all the notices at once and zero out the count. I like that better.  It doesn’t go away either. Kewl I don’t have a webcam going.null 

Si says
As I said, 99% of the time that is what happens. The small variance is simply timing, and I have noticed similar variances on FB timing and FB does not have all the “highlighted” stuff at the top either … they just use a different color (grey and white vs yellow and white).

The only main thing different about FB is that they only fill in the older items when you scroll down instead of prefill … but that’s just a caching choice … ours is still as efficient server->client traffic wise.

Si says
… and I hope you are not talking about the fact that items re-appear every time @seth “trues them up” … thats a feature the Wizard wants, and I don’t mind it. 

Si says
… and unless you are talking about things you are directly @mark tagged in, like this one … you have to actually click through those and read them before they go away from the top. That’s the whole point. They are put there by people so that you are sure to see them … like this one which is helping you learn about the new features of SeriTD.  

They start with “You were tagged by so&so in -”

Mark de LA says
Yeah, I don’t like that feature.

Si says
I knew you would not, even said that directly when the feature came out. I know you well and know you view it as spam. But whatever, we need a way to “get the attention of others focused on a thought” sometimes … that’s important to good flow … and this is a very easy way to do it and is super easy for you to manage too, you just click through them to clear them … if you actually read what’s on the other side is your business. SeriTD only records what your eyes do with your webcam, she doesn’t enforce anything based on that.  

Mark de LA says
You know me very little.  Your made up story you know well. null

Si says
Well, it happened exactly the way I thought it, and even wrote it originally before the fact. So either it is as I say and I write the story with my thoughts and the stronger vibration wins common ground, or it is not as you say and I do know you well. One or the other.  

Seth says
Conversation forked to thought 21361

Mark de LA says
21359 is an example.  I like FB in that the majority of items or posts are singular thoughts & only famous people with lots of subscribers & friends tend to nest but very little back & forth by one person with another. 

I like new thoughts. Old rehashed ones – not so much. 


Si says
Not sure I understand this. thought 21359 is being kept focused because of the new curation ability. Otherwise it would have diverged into real rwg, or just a dog pile, a couple of times.

Si says
Also, you are the main one who has said that you like that FB allows you to delete any comments you want. So what gives? Why the flip?

Si says
Why are you deleting my questions? Are they not realistic and simply asking for clarification on apparent inconsistencies?

Mark de LA says
just testing out the new mechanisms.null

Si says

Mark de LA says
Or something else like the RWG. null Your act is like you have some secret information or knowledge about others.  Polish it up a bit & maybe go on stage somewhere. null

Si says
It’s not secret. I just pay attention to it. Not everyone does.  

Most people would say Richard Bandler and Tony Robbins have secret information. 

Mark de LA says
Missed point. I know what RB & TR are up to. A lot of your assertions ring false over here. I am not inclined to go back-&-forth with you about it either. Not inclined to waste any more effort on it.  Meh.null

Si says
As you wish. I simply do that which actually works.    ???

Seth says

Seth says
if i can predict what will happen in some context, then my model (my story) of what is happening in that context will ring true to me.   i do believe that that works the same with you guys.   Which is why i think we should trust somebody else’s story which predicts something more than a story which predicts nothing  … er, even when the story predicts what we do ourselves, .  
 .
Just saying, the ability to predict does lend credence to a story. 

Si says

Holmes says
LOL

I can take anything away from you I want. I have that power.

But it is up to you to experience it if you want to. You have that power.

They are not required to agree … we only do that together when we want to.


Seth says
“I can take anything away from you I want. I have that power.” ← sounds like profound confusion to me.

Si says
Or profound creativity … the kind that creates worlds and melts hearts and astonishes with wonder and splendor. Profound creativity does not live in a box where freedoms can be taken and expereinced … it lives in the imagination where anything can become experience!

Si says
Taking away freedom is an idea that can only be experienced in a very small singular universe.

Seth says
Well in the contexts which you want  that kind of omnipotent power, i will steer clear.  Create there whatever … i will not be a part of it … maybe I will view it from afar … like i would view a piece of sculpture.   But no, i will not be interacting with that kind of being … it is not my spirt to do so.

Mark de LA says
My tag line in the item itself says it all! null

Si says
You are that kind of being … that is why you can choose to be away from what you do not wish.

And why Mark understands deeply in his being that “In fact you can’t take it away from me ultimately for very long.”

These are only true because you are in fact “that kind of being”, and deep down, you know it to be true, even if you play a simpler role most often.  

Seth says

Seth says
like i said … confusion. 

Si says
The confusion is only between the role you are playing and what you actually are … not in the ideas themselves, they are sound and easy to understand.

Seth says
i might understand what you are saying,  but it is contrafactual in the generality in which you uttered it.    You said, quite literally that you have the power to take away anything from me that you want … that simply is not the case.  I just drank some coffee and feel its’s effect on my gullet and its lingering taste in my mouth.  Do you really think that if you wanted to make that go away, you could?  If you do, then you are profoundly confused my friend.

Si says
I can take anything away from you I want. I can experience that to any degree I choose to and believe that I can.

I can’t chose your experience for you. You are 100% in control of what you experience. And the role you are playing, which is set up by your current beliefs, will determine what you experience and how closely the details you experience match mine.

Why is this so confusing?

Mark de LA says
Have some more – null

Seth says
what you said there is not confusing.   but in your original statement you were talking about me … not your image of me that is inside you.  With that image of me that is inside you, you can do whatever floats your boat. ( i trust you will treat it nicely null)   The confusion in your statement is what specifically the “you” in your statement refered to.  When you talk to me and call me out,  then you must know that i will not interpert your words as talking only about your creepy little conceptions of me … no when you talk of “seth” i must assume that you are talking of the real one that you do not control, but rather i do. 

in your last, more articulate explanation, it was clear in context that when you said “me” you were talking only of your image of me, so it was not confusing.

Si says
In both, I am talking about the entirety of you that I experience. Everything that I know of and experience as you. And of course, that is wildly different than the you that you experience as you, in many many ways … there is simply no edge to that. Any of the circumstances I experience of you or about you can be different from what you experience. What is the same, and what is different, is simply what we are each selecting right now … not what some outside blueprint designates.

Seth says
ok,  but you are talking to me … out here … not to yourself.  

…. er, and just what specifically are you saying of which “there is no edge” ?   there certainly is an edge between you and I.   In most cases I can tell precisely what is inside me and what is not.  For example your image of me inside of you is not inside me.  

Si says
There is no edge to what can be different between what I experience of you and what you experience of you. They will always be at least some different, and that slider can go all the way to completely different. That there are often some things that are the same is something we agree upon, co-create, it is not a fact of anything or required by anything other than that our beliefs select it to be so.

Mark de LA says

Seth says
Conversation forked to thought 21393

Mark de LA says
First time I found the #PoliticalCorrectness term #EthnicIntimidation  in this article ← new crime ? True it sounds from the article like there was racism, but fuck free speech. null I wonder if he goes to jail for it.

See Also

  1. Thought Racism Card is the ultimate card in politics for this generation with 7 viewings related by tag "PoliticalCorrectness".