There was a Fo Hammer sighting at the FBI today

Much like a bear sighting at my campground … warning out to those with thoughts that there is a destructive entity about, laying waste to thoughts having differing ideas. null

Comments


Seth says
null ironic that “About: REpresentation - comment 57743” is about  a listening that went into privacy, like a tower of babble falling, … and has the byline “Multiple Egos not listening to each other”. 

Mark de LA says
Less ironic & more eyeball getting.  You see I have said many times I can tell when someone is understand me & listening.  Disagreement is OK . No indication of understanding & yet repetition ad nauseum is what the 21412 is all about

Seth says
yes it is hard to see this as anything other than destructive of our sharing this thinking media … like a bear looking for its own food.

Mark de LA says
Calling people names is what FauxNav is all about with his FOHammer.

Seth says
but mark you didn’t say anything new that i could hear … all you did was zig away from what i was saying.

Mark de LA says
Sometimes thninking is hard for some people. 

Mark de LA says
THat is exactly the feeling I get when you ignore what I have written.

Seth says

i don’t know about you guys,

but this just feels like deja vu to me.

Mark de LA says
I usually back off & go private/draft when something attracts a lot of rwg or  whatever.  Forking makes it even more problematic since some people willfully continue somewhere else outside my authorship. You folks can go back-&-forth yourselves all you like – half-life of dark matter beginning soon. 

Si says
If you remember, deja vu is a shift in the matrix. It’s when your verse shifts from one parallel track to another. Reference the movie “The Matrix”.

Yes @mark, movies are valid information about reality … thanks for thinking they are not.  

Seth says
so very strange … i reported a observation … you asked questions about it … i tried to answered your questions as best i could … me, i did not notice any what you call rwg from my end.  maybe you wanted me to just accept your judgement that my observation was somehow flawed without any description of why it was flawed or off topic.  so sorrry, @mark, that is not the way things work here, or anywhere. 

Si says

Seth says
That’s a trip

but it’s even simpler than that … Been there … Done that … Don’t want to spit again!

Si says

Si says
“since some people willfully continue somewhere else outside my authorship” …

That should be a good thing. If it’s outside your authorship then you don’t have to make it your business at all. You don’t even have to look at it unless someone explicitly tags you by name. This is a good thing.

What is it that compels you to stay with something you don’t like when you don’t even have to? Why would you follow what you say is rwg when it’s outside your area?