Beware of Asshammers - comment 57777

Navigator says ...
I will not be bullied by you @mark. Your father tried the same exact bullying shit with me you do, on his death bed, and I looked him in the eye and said “no, fuck you” when he was pulling this exact same shit. After he realized I was not going to back down, he softened and respected me for it for the rest of our time together.

Thing is, you don’t have his smarts, because you are still living in his shadow, doing the same shit he did, but not owning it like he did. It doesn’t matter what your age is, you still have not learned to be your own man and be responsible for, and live out, your own actions … you only copy the actions of others.
See thought 21397 for how to live your own authentic life.

Comments


Si says
What is the boz on this @seth? Is it a human expressing uniqueness? Did I get that close?

Seth says
the 5 is definitely human.   i don’t know what [thought 4283] is yet.  privacy is a wall against my interpertations.

Si says
thought 4283 simply doesn’t exist … the <private> designation should probably reflect that in some way … though we don’t want users to know if a <private> thought does exist … it should be a maybe.

Seth says
okay.  i have thought about a ability to write thoughts in these unused thought numbers … especially the primes.  it would allow me (or even us) to build out a prime number ontology.  without that we will need to imagine or designate using lists what elements like 13 stands for.   thing is that would fold in the intentional with the coincidental … i have no idea if that would yield real matches.  a tickelish issue indeed.

Si says
Technically easy … but I have my doubts about the bozimatry of it. If you are getting consciously involved in the content, then it’s a whole different system.