# Profound ?

### About: Euler's Identity

e ^(?i) +1 = 0

it is not really all that amazing to find simplicity as a consequence of simplifying

Naaaa ... it's just in the definition of e

### Tags

- eulers identity
- mathematics
- formula
- seth cartoons
- pi
- profound

### Comments

*Seth says* i don't think so ... all of those have "natural definitions" ... the
odd ball is e ... and has a wierd definition. You cannot define 1, 0,
or π to be any different without turning math on it's ear. But you can
say that the value of e is a consequence of legislating this formula. If we legislated another formula, ... say e ^ (iπ) + 3 = 0 ... then the value of e would just be different, and the natural log tables would be different.

*Mark de LA says*Well, just because we both like to argue, consider this:

Napier lived 1550-1617 inventor of logarithms (probably)

Euler lived 1707-1783 did a lot of other stuff including the identity equation of Euler (?maybe)

The base of natural logarithms is e. See the Wikipedia stuff on natural logarithms. (see the section on "Reason for being Natural" - it wasn't arbitrary!)

I would say that Napier defined "e" and natural logarithms before Euler came along!

Another nice feature of e is that the plot of the function e^^x crosses the ordinate at 1 .

So I would say that the definition came with logarithms. Euler's equation either defines each of them or none of them. It shows an exquisite relationship amongst these well know numbers.

*Seth says* M, i think i knew that. you need to look deeper.

*Seth says*Let me be more specific. The definition of 0, 1, and ? are not in question. They are a fixed part of a huge body of mathmatical know how. The base of natural logorithms was chosen arbritrarily as the most convenient value that it could possibly be. Now Euler's Identity can be looked at as the consequence of that choice, or it can be looked at as the choice itself. ... hmmm what is the ming for QED ?

*Seth says* M 2006-05-09 07:29:55 3516

You are right, of course. I am playing fast and loose with the definition of arbitrary. Point is that something was chosen here. That choice was kind of a legislation. It could have been chosen differently. But Napier chose to make his formulae simple but choosing this to be the value of the base. The reasoning could have proceeded from Euler's Identity ... that could have been the starting point, rather than the consequence. Natural" - it wasn't arbitrary!)

I would say that Napier defined "e" and natural logarithms before Euler came along!

I would say that Napier defined "e" and natural logarithms before Euler came along!

This formula is so very simple because Napier chose to simplify ... and not quite so paradoxical as quoted in the Wikipedia:

source: Kasner and Newman p.103

After proving the identity in a lecture, Benjamin Peirce, a noted nineteenth century mathematician and Harvard professor, said, "It is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means, but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth."

After proving the identity in a lecture, Benjamin Peirce, a noted nineteenth century mathematician and Harvard professor, said, "It is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what it means, but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the truth."

I too was amazed by this formula. But if you think about how it came to be, it is not really all that amazing to find simplicity as a consequence of simplifying.

*Mark de LA says* As far as answering the question - profound ?

*Seth says* naaah. The clerk can call out "suare root of minus one" as an ordinal number just as easily as she can call out "37". Now if the machine was issueing a currency with an cardinal denomination, ... it would not only be profound but also fraudulant.

*Mark de LA says* Well, then let me buy some goods from the speaktome catalog for an imaginary number of dollars

*Seth says*When you first learned about pi, didn't you have to kind of squinch up your mind to accept that it was based on the diameter rather than the radius ? ... i did.

*Mark de LA says* seth 2007-04-10 23:18:36 3516

When you first learned about pi, didn't you have to kind of squinch up your mind to accept that it was based on the diameter rather than the radius ? ... i did.

When you first learned about pi, didn't you have to kind of squinch up your mind to accept that it was based on the diameter rather than the radius ? ... i did.

Well this is cute. I would have to study the derivation to see how one switches to a minus if the "pi" changes to refer to a radius. OTOH, I think that the traditional pi makes sense when you look at a figure like the one from below:

Because of the curvature I can see that the circumference is at least twice the diameter & probably some more - 3.1415926535897932384626433832795 ought to do it for now.

*Seth says* M 2007-04-11 13:05:24 3516

Do you mean that the ratio ~ 1 to 3 is almost visible in the diagram? For me that was not the criteria ... me, i knew that the center point and radius was what determines the circle and that the radium appears in many more formula than the diameter. So i was dissapointed when i learned that pi was calculated based on the diameter. I think that the traditional pi makes sense when you look at a figure like the one from below:

*Seth says*### See Also

- Thought
**ZNUZ IS ZNEES - VOL 1 - 2nd edition**with 289 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**War with North Korea**with 185 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**about: manifold - wikipedia**with 85 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**ZNUZ IS ZNEES - VOLUME 2**with 70 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**Simple math problem from a dream ...**with 46 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**ZNUZ IS ZNEES - volume III**with 45 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**ZNUZ IS ZNEES - VOL 4**with 39 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**e^i π = -1**with 35 viewings related by tag "eulers identity". - Thought
**Meandering Around - Mathematically**with 21 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**Facinating**with 5 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**In persuit of gold letters**with 2 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**Turning the torus inside out**with 2 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**about: from 1st to 4th dimension**with 1 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**pi**with 0 viewings related by tag "pi". - Thought
**Taking a Shit on Pi Day**with 0 viewings related by tag "pi". - Thought
**The RSS Putsch**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**about: Mark's Hollywood Ending**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**Pie = Pi**with 0 viewings related by tag "pi". - Thought
**Remember Bagdad Bob?**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**about: hypotrochoid**with 0 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**I won't vote for a politician without a blog !**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**Godel**with 0 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**about: hmmm ....**with 0 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**In pursuit of political blogs ...**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**Dvorak's collection of administraion offcials**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**about: Thanks, Ann ... watch the video**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**Flaming Laser Sword of Newton**with 0 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**about: Cris Rock on HBO**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**Prime Sieve**with 0 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**Bush em with Coulter ... make em shiny and bright!**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**about: rima regas - google+ - maths simple visual how trigonometry works**with 0 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**about: They're ba-a-a-ck**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**An RSS Melodrama (interpertation)**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**Two peas in a pod.**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**Moving Parts create Possibilities.**with 0 viewings related by tag "mathematics". - Thought
**about: How Channel 4 assassinated President Bush**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons". - Thought
**seth cartoons**with 0 viewings related by tag "seth cartoons".